Longitudinal Outcomes of Supported Education Programs for Individuals with Psychiatric Disabilities

Authors

  • Dr. Krunal Soni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v26i2.100

Keywords:

Supported Education, Psychiatric Disabilities, Postsecondary Education, Employment Outcomes, Psychosocial Well-being.

Abstract

Background: Persons with psychiatric disabilities face immense challenges with higher learning institution enrollment and completion rates, and these have bearings on their employment outcomes as well as their psychosocial well-being.

Objective: To determine the extent to which supported education programs are effective in the long term in promoting the psychosocial adjustment, employment opportunities, and academic achievement of disabled individuals with psychiatric disorders.

Methods: The study adopted the PRISMA criteria for a systematic review of the literature.  The studies included in the review are derived from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and PsycINFO databases from 2014 to 2024.  Based on the inclusion criteria, the studies had to assess the long-term outcomes of supported education programs, and treatments on academic achievement, employment, and mental health (minimum follow-up of six months).  The relative effectiveness of several supported education program models was also compared.  Where necessary, the Z-values, P-values, standard deviation, and mean differences were obtained.

Results: This indicates that SEd participants had higher enrollment, retention, and completion rates of between 40-60%, 75%, and up to 80% respectively as compared to non-participants.  Employment outcomes also demonstrated an enhancement as the graduates achieved a higher number of jobs by 25-45%, having full-time work and increasing their income by a range of 20-30%.  The positive psychosocial benefits include increased self-esteem, better social adjustment, which was reported at eighty per cent, and a reduction in re-hospitalization rates of thirty to fifty per cent.  Mobile services were most effective for patients with severe mental conditions, on-campus supported education programs models had the highest academic retention rate, and hybrid models had the highest satisfaction rate of 88%.

Conclusion: People with psychiatric disorders benefit from supported education programs in terms of psychosocial rehabilitation, employment, and academic performance. The areas that should be addressed in future studies include long-term outcomes, workplace support, and policy-based strategies to enhance supported education programs effectiveness and availability.

 

Author Biography

Dr. Krunal Soni

Associate Professor, School of Management Studies and Liberal Arts, GSFC University, Vadodara

References

[1] H. I. Cannella-Malone and J. M. Schaefer, “A Review of Research on Teaching People With Significant Disabilities Vocational Skills,” Career Dev. Transit. Except. Individ., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 67–78, May 2017, doi: 10.1177/2165143415583498.

[2] K. V. Unger, W. A. Anthony, K. Sciarappa, and E. S. Rogers, “A supported education program for young adults with long-term mental illness,” Hosp. Community Psychiatry, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 838–842, Aug. 1991, doi: 10.1176/ps.42.8.838.

[3] J. Hofstra, J. van der Velde, P. J. Havinga, and L. Korevaar, “Community Participation through Education (COMPARE): effectiveness of supported education for students with mental health problems, a mixed methods study – study protocol for a randomised controlled trial,” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 332, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03329-5.

[4] G. Gal, E. Shadmi, G. Hoter-Ishay, M. Gelkopf, and D. Roe, “Comparing outcome measures of persons with severe mental illness in vocational rehabilitation programs: a dual perspective of consumers and providers,” Int. J. Qual. Health Care, vol. 34, no. Supplement_1, pp. ii105–ii111, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1093/intact/mzaa030.

[5] M. E. Collins, D. Bybee, and C. T. Mowbray, “Effectiveness of Supported Education for Individuals with Psychiatric Disabilities: Results from an Experimental Study,” Community Ment. Health J., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 595–613, Dec. 1998, doi: 10.1023/A:1018763018186.

[6] J. L. Thompson et al., “Evaluating Educational and Employment Services for Young People With Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review,” Psychiatr. Serv., vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 787–800, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000033.

[7] M. Cecchetti, J. Last, J. Lynch, and C. Linehan, “Evaluating the longitudinal impact of a disability education intervention on medical students’ attitudes towards persons with a disability,” Disabil. Health J., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 101092, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101092.

[8] M. L. D’Amico, L. E. Jaffe, and J. A. Gardner, “Evidence for Interventions to Improve and Maintain Occupational Performance and Participation for People With Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review,” Am. J. Occup. Ther., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 7205190020p1-7205190020p11, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.5014/ajot.2018.033332.

[9] J. Hofstra, J. Van Der Velde, M. Farkas, L. Korevaar, and S. Büttner, “Supported education for students with psychiatric disabilities: A systematic review of effectiveness studies from 2009 to 2021.,” Psychiatr. Rehabil. J., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 173–184, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1037/prj0000528.

[10] E. Lin et al., “Looking across health and healthcare outcomes for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and psychiatric disorders: population-based longitudinal study,” Br. J. Psychiatry, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 51–57, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.202.

[11] D. Zhang, E. Roberts, R. Maddalozzo, Y.-F. Li, M. Orsag, and T. Glass, “Post-Secondary Education Outcomes for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Self-Determination, Independent Living, Employment, and the Impact of COVID-19,” Behav. Sci., vol. 13, no. 10, Art. no. 10, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.3390/bs13100832.

[12] J. A. Cook et al., “Results of a Multisite Randomized Trial of Supported Employment Interventions for Individuals With Severe Mental Illness,” Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 505–512, May 2005, doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.5.505.

[13] A. Malda et al., “Supported Education and Supported Employment for Individuals at Clinical-High Risk of Psychosis: A Pilot Study,” J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 331–343, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40737-022-00312-5.

[14] C. T. Mowbray, M. Collins, and D. Bybee, “Supported education for individuals with psychiatric disabilities: Long-term outcomes from an experimental study,” Soc. Work Res., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 89–100, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1093/swr/23.2.89.

[15] H. Ringeisen, M. Langer Ellison, A. Ryder-Burge, K. Biebel, S. Alikhan, and E. Jones, “Supported education for individuals with psychiatric disabilities: State of the practice and policy implications,” Psychiatr. Rehabil. J., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2017, doi: 10.1037/prj0000233.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-19