Energy Justice and Environmental Rehabilitation: Legal Frameworks for a Just Energy Transition

Authors

  • Konark Pratap Gupta
  • Prof. (Dr.) Fakkiresh S. Sakkarnaikar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v27i2.102

Keywords:

Rehabilitation, Environment, Energy Justice, Legal framework

Abstract

The transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy is not merely an economic or technological shift; it represents a profound legal and ethical challenge. Central to this transformation is energy justice, which demands that the benefits and burdens of energy policies be equitably distributed. This article examines the legal frameworks and policy instruments governing environmental rehabilitation in regions impacted by the legacy of fossil fuel extraction and industrial activities. By integrating interdisciplinary scholarship, international legal instruments, and judicial perspectives from Europe, North America, and emerging economies, the analysis highlights the limitations of traditional doctrines such as the “polluter pays” principle and argues for a comprehensive, hybrid model of accountability. Special attention is given to the multifaceted nature of rehabilitation—from technical remediation to socio-economic renewal—and the ways in which procedural and recognition justice mechanisms can be better integrated into legal systems to support affected communities during a just energy transition.

Author Biographies

Konark Pratap Gupta

Research Scholar (Ph.D.), Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 

Prof. (Dr.) Fakkiresh S. Sakkarnaikar

Professor of Law, Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 

References

1. Aarhus Convention. (1998). Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

2. Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. D., & Evans, B. (2002). Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. MIT Press.

3. European Commission. (2020). Just Transition Mechanism. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu

4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2017). Remediation Technologies for Contaminated Sites. EPA.

5. Jenkins, K. (2013). Energy Justice: Re-balancing the Trilemma of Security, Equity and Sustainability. Cambridge University Press.

6. Knick v. Township of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 1362 (2019).

7. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). The Economics of Environmental and Resource Issues. OECD Publishing.

8. Pellow, D. N. (2018). What Is Critical Environmental Justice? Polity Press.

9. Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. C. (2007). A Climate of Injustice: Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy. MIT Press.

10. Sovacool, B. K., & Dworkin, M. H. (2015). Energy Justice: Conceptual Insights and Practical Applications. Applied Energy, 142, 434–444.

11. UNEP. (2019). Global Environment Outlook – Regional Assessments. United Nations Environment Programme.

12. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.

13. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). The Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

14. Vandenbergh, R. G. (2017). Environmental Liability in the Context of Energy Transitions. Environmental Law Review, 19(2), 105–125.

15. Wright, B., & Newell, P. (2017). Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-10