Investigation of Fan Attitudes Toward the Video Assistant Referee System in Football

Authors

  • Engin VURAL
  • Tuncay KIRATLI
  • Sinem TOÇOĞLU
  • Yavuz YILDIRIM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i1.131

Keywords:

Video Assistant Referee (VAR) System, Football, Fans

Abstract

This study aims to examine fan attitudes toward the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system, which is applied in football matches involving Super League teams where professional football clubs compete. A total of 403 volunteer fans, 181 female and 222 male, between the ages of 19 and 65 from Bitlis Province, Turkey, participated in the study. Data were collected using a personal information form and the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) System Fan Attitude Scale developed by Tabuk (2022) The study data were analyzed using the SPSS 26 software package. A one-way MANOVA test was applied to the data. As a result of the analysis, no significant difference was found in any of the factors according to the gender variable (p>0.05). However, according to marital status, a significant difference was found in the factors of contribution to football and competition pressure. The mean contribution to the football score of single individuals was higher than that of married individuals, while the mean competition pressure score of married individuals was significantly higher than that of single individuals (p<0.05). Regarding the age variable, a significant difference was found in the factors of contribution to football and competition pressure. The mean contribution to the football score of participants between the ages of 19 and 25 was higher than that of those between the ages of 46 and 55 (p<0.05). A significant difference was also found in all factors according to educational level. It was determined that the mean scores for contribution to football and game management were higher among secondary education-level participants than among graduate-level participants (p<0.05). In the competition pressure factor, the mean score of undergraduate graduates was higher than that of secondary education graduates. Additionally, for general VAR attitude, the mean score of undergraduate graduates was significantly higher than that of graduate-degree holders (p<0.05). In conclusion, the research findings indicate that while there was no significant difference in attitudes toward the VAR system based on gender, significant differences were observed in certain factors according to marital status, age, and education level. In particular, it was observed that single and younger participants had higher perceptions of contribution to football, married individuals felt competition pressure more intensely, and attitudes toward the VAR system varied as the level of education increased. Future studies should analyze psychological and sociocultural factors to gain a deeper understanding of how attitudes toward the VAR system are shaped across different demographic groups.

Author Biographies

Engin VURAL

Mus Alparslan University, Institute of Social Sciences, Muş/Türkiye

Tuncay KIRATLI

Bayburt University, Graduate School of Education, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Bayburt/Turkey

Sinem TOÇOĞLU

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Necat Hepkon Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi, İzmir, Türkiye

Yavuz YILDIRIM

Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Graduate School of Education, Department of Recreation, Sakarya/ Turkey

References

1. Akşar, T. (2005). Endüstriyel futbol. Literatür Yayınları.

2. Aydın, A. D., Turgut, M., & Bayırlı, R. (2007). Spor kulüplerinin halka açılmasının Türkiye’de uygulanan modeller açısından incelenmesi. Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (1), 59-70.

3. Baldwin, C. F. (2014). Video killed the sports referee: The role of video replay technology in creating anxiety and stress amongst rugby league referees. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(6), 305-312.

4. Bangsbo, S. (2003). Physiology of training. In Science and soccer (pp. 55-66). Routledge.

5. Demir, M. (2019). Endüstriyel futbol ve futbolda teknoloji kullanımı. TRT Akademi Dergisi, 4(7), 86-103.

6. Demir, O., & Bektaş, M. (2022). Video yardımcı hakem uygulamasının (VAR) Türk futbolu üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi. Enderun, 6(2), 168-180.

7. Devecioğlu, S., & Çoban, B. (2003). Türkiye’de profesyonel futbolun finansı. Spor Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(3), 1-8.

8. Erdoğan, Ç. H. (2021). Futbolcuların video yardımcı hakem (VAR) sistemi hakkındaki görüşleri. Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 113-123.

9. Engin, S. G., & Çelik, V. O. (2019). Var’lığın yeter! Hakemlerin gözünden video yardımcı hakem sistemi. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 7(2), 53-68.

10. Hamsund, T., & Scelles, N. (2021). Fans’ perceptions towards video assistant referee (VAR) in the English Premier League. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120573

11. İnan, T. (2007). Türkiye’deki futbol kulüplerinin gişe gelirlerini artırmaya yönelik uygulamaların incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

12. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications.

13. Kayhan, R. F., Bardakçı, S., & Caz, Ç. (2020). Türk futbolunda video yardımcı hakem (VAR) uygulamasına yönelik tutum ölçeği geliştirilmesi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 16(27), 571-596. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.673635

14. Kinnear, T. C., & Taylor, J. R. (1996). Marketing research: An applied approach. McGraw-Hill.

15. Koçer, M. (2012). Futbol derneklerine üye olan taraftarların şiddet ve holiganizm eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi: Kayseri örneği. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 32(1), 111-135.

16. Kurtuluş, K. (2004). Pazarlama araştırmaları (7. baskı). Literatür Yayıncılık.

17. Malhotra, N. K. (2004). Marketing research: An applied orientation (4. ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

18. Morgan, T. C. (2000). Psikolojiye giriş (Hacettepe Üniversitesi Psikoloji Bölümü öğretim elemanları, Çev.). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Psikoloji Bölümü Yayınları.

19. Samuel, R. D., Galily, Y., Filho, E., & Tenenbau, G. (2020). Implementation of the video assistant referee (VAR) as a career change-event: The Israeli Premier League case study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 564855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564855

20. Saygidar, M. (2023). Futbol hakemlerinin video yardımcı hakem sistemine yönelik tutumları ile hakem öz yeterliği arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

21. Tamir, I., & Bar-Eli, M. (2021). The moral gatekeeper: Soccer and technology, the case of video assistant referee (VAR). Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 613469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613469

22. Tabuk, M. E. (2022). Futbolda uygulanan video yardımcı hakem sistemi hakkında taraftar tutumlarını belirlemeye yönelik ölçek geliştirme çalışması. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 432-449. https://doi.org/10.33459/cbubesbd.1140466

23. Turkish Football Federation. (2020). Futbol oyun kuralları. https://www.tff.org/Resources/TFF/Documents/MHK/2023-2024/oyun-kurallari.pdf

24. Yardımcı, O. (1996). Futbol kültürü ve eğitimi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Matbaası.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11