A Gastronomical Value For Vegan And Vegetarian Consumers: Different Magnolia Experiments

Authors

  • Gizem Özgürel
  • Emrah Örgün
  • Aydın Ünal
  • Emre Çilesiz
  • Cevat Ercik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i1.193

Keywords:

Gastronomy Tourism, Vegan, Vegetarian, Magnolia, Sensory Analysis Test.

Abstract

This study aims to test magnolia as a new gastronomic product suitable for vegan and vegetarian consumers' own diets. In this context, new recipes were created using plant-based milks in line with the sustainability and healthy living approach as an alternative to the traditional magnolia dessert containing animal milk. The study also aimed to evaluate the sensory properties of plant-based dessert alternatives and to examine how consumers perceive desserts made with plant-based milks. During the recipe preparation process, magnolia desserts were prepared using three different types of milk, namely cow's milk, almond milk and oat milk, and a sensory analysis test was applied to these products. 100 participants who have mastered the subject at the Department of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, Sinop University evaluated these products in terms of sensory properties such as taste, smell, consistency and color. Participants were not informed about the types of milk in the recipes of magnolia desserts in advance, and the evaluations were made entirely based on personal perception. The basic findings obtained show that plant-based milks can be an alternative to traditional animal-based milk desserts in terms of sensory analysis. In particular, almond milk-based magnolia received positive feedback in terms of taste and consistency, while oat milk-based magnolia received lower appreciation rates in terms of color and taste. Although animal milk magnolia received the highest appreciation in general, plant-based milk alternatives were found to be acceptable by consumers.

Author Biographies

Gizem Özgürel

Associate Professor, Balıkesir University, Burhaniye Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Tourism Management, 10700 Balıkesir, Türkiye. 

Emrah Örgün

Associate Professor, Sinop University, Tourism Faculty, Department of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, 57000 Sinop, Türkiye. 

Aydın Ünal

Associate Professor, Sinop University, Tourism Faculty, Department of Recreation Management, 57000 Sinop, Türkiye. 

Emre Çilesiz

Associate Professor, Sinop University, Tourism Faculty, Department of Tourism Guidance, 57000 Sinop, Türkiye. 

Cevat Ercik

Lecturer (Ph.D.), Mersin University, Tourism Faculty, Department of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, 33110 Mersin, Türkiye. 

References

1. Altuğ Onoğur, T., & Elmacı, Y. (2019). Gıdalarda duyusal değerlendirme. İzmir: Sidas Yayıncılık.

2. Balcı, T. N. (2018). Türkiye'de yaşayan vegan ve vejetaryen bireylere özgü besin tüketim sıklığı anketi geliştirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.

3. Bilici, R. (2022). Vegan mutfağı kapsamında geliştirilmiş yenilikçi bir ürün: bitkisel bazlı pastacı kreması. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul.

4. Çakıcı, H. H., Özkan Kutlu, T., & Yılmaz, H. (2020). Yazılı medyada veganlığın ve vejetaryenliğin sunumu. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 7(1), 279-296.

5. Gökçen, M., Aksoy, Y. Ç., & Özcan, B. A. (2019). Vegan beslenme tarzına sağlık açısından genel bakış. Sağlık ve Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 50-54.

6. Goldner, M. C., & Zamora, M. C. (2007). Sensory characterization of vitis vinifera cv. malbec wines from seven viticulture regions of argentina. Journal of Sensory Studies, 22, 520-532.

7. Karabudak, E. (2008). Vejetaryen beslenmesi. Sağlık Bakanlığı Yayın No: 726. Ankara: Klasmat Matbaacılık.

8. Lawless, H. T., & Heymann, H. (2010). Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. Springer Science&Business Media.

9. Özcan T., & Baysal S. (2016). Vejetaryen beslenme ve sağlık üzerine etkileri. U.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 101-116.

10. Pala, K. (2023). Unutulmaya yüz tutmuş yöresel amasya yemeklerinin duyusal analizle değerlendirilmesi. 19 Mayıs Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(3), 197-208.

11. Peryam, D. R., & Pilgrim, F. J. (1957). Hedonic scale method of measuring food preferences. Food Technology, 11(Suppl.), 9-14.

12. Seçim, Y., Akyol, N., & Kaya, M. (2022). Vejetaryen beslenme türleri. Sosyal, Beşerî ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 66-82.

13. Shipman, Z. D. (2021). Beslenmede vejeteryan modeli. Aydın Gastronomy, 5(1), 45-62.

14. Stone, H., & Sidel, J. L. (2004). Sensory evaluation practices. (3. edition). Academic Press.

15. Tunçay Son, G. Y., & Bulut, M. (2016). Yaşam tarzı olarak vegan ve vejetaryenlik. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 830-843.

16. Tunçay, G. Y. (2018). Sağlık yönüyle vegan/vejetaryenlik. Avrasya Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 25-29.

17. Vatandost, E. G., & İnce Karaçeper, E. (2024). Gastronomi çalışmalarında alternatif reçete geliştirme: vegan, vejetaryen ve laktozsuz panna cotta. Sosyal, Beşerî ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 31-42.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-22