Comprehensive Validation of Analytical Methods Using A Risk-Based Approach: Application to RP-HPLC and UV techniques for Methotrexate

Authors

  • Mr. Sachin S. Shinde
  • Dr. Preeti Khulbe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i1.201

Keywords:

Box-Behnken Design, Critical Process Parameters, Critical Method Attributes, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, Quality by Design, Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), Ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry (UV-Vis)

Abstract

Aim: This research aims to evaluate the approaches based on a risk-based framework in quantification of anticancer drugs including Methotrexate by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometry.

Methodology: The validation of the analytical procedure was conducted in accordance with the Q2(R2) guidelines of the ICH (International Council for Harmonisation), which incorporate risk management principles such as QbD (Quality by Design) and FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis). By use of a BBD (Box-Behnken Design), critical method attributes (CMAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs) were found and refined. Using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system with a C18 reverse-phase column, chromatographic separation was accomplished; UV analysis was conducted using a Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer. To guarantee method dependability and regulatory compliance, investigations on system appropriateness, linearity, precision, robustness, accuracy, specificity, and forced degradation were undertaken.

Result: A chromatographic assay of Methotrexate was found to be valid with regular retention (~5.25 min), precision (RSD <2%), accuracy (99.1–100.8% recovery), and ruggedness. Stability studies revealed mild degradation after 12 hours, and forced degradation established hydrolytic and oxidative vulnerability but thermal stability. The assay is a reliable method for pharmaceutical use.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the study confirmed HPLC procedure guarantees accurate Methotrexate measurement with high precision, accuracy, and robustness. Stability results suggest controlled storage conditions for analytical integrity to support its use in pharmaceutical quality control.

Author Biographies

Mr. Sachin S. Shinde

Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur                                                                

Dr. Preeti Khulbe

Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur

References

1. Marson BM, Concentino V, Junkert AM, Fachi MM, Vilhena RO, Pontarolo R. Validation of analytical methods in a pharmaceutical quality system: An overview focused on HPLC methods. Química Nova. 2020 Oct 16;43:1190-203.

2. Viceconti M, Pappalardo F, Rodriguez B, Horner M, Bischoff J, Tshinanu FM. In silico trials: Verification, validation and uncertainty quantification of predictive models used in the regulatory evaluation of biomedical products. Methods. 2021 Jan 1;185:120-7.

3. Yabré M, Ferey L, Somé IT, Gaudin K. Greening reversed-phase liquid chromatography methods using alternative solvents for pharmaceutical analysis. Molecules. 2018 May 2;23(5):1065.

4. Karadurmus L, Kaya SI, Ozcelikay G, Gumustas M, Uslu B, Ozkan SA. Validation Requirements in Biosensors. InBiosensors 2022 Jul 11 (pp. 313-342). CRC Press.

5. Deidda R, Orlandini S, Hubert P, Hubert C. Risk-based approach for method development in pharmaceutical quality control context: A critical review. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. 2018 Nov 30;161:110-21.

6. Benetti C, Benetti AA. Quality by Design in Formulation Development. InIntroduction to Quality by Design (QbD) From Theory to Practice 2024 Apr 10 (pp. 139-159). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

7. Sharma KD, Srivastava S. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) implementation: a literature review. Journal of Advance Research in Aeronautics and Space Science. 2018 Apr;5(1):1-7.

8. Bhalerao A, Shelke MS, Borkar V. Advances, Applications, and Challenges in RP HPLC Method Development. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication, and Technology. 2023;3:111-23.

9. Welink J, Xu Y, Yang E, Wilson A, Henderson N, Luo L, Fraser S, Kavita U, Musuku A, James C, Fraier D. 2018 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis:‘A global bioanalytical community perspective on last decade of incurred samples reanalysis (ISR)’(Part 1–small molecule regulated bioanalysis, small molecule biomarkers, peptides & oligonucleotide bioanalysis). Bioanalysis. 2018 Nov 1;10(22):1781-801.

10. Schieppati D, Patience NA, Campisi S, Patience GS. Experimental methods in chemical engineering: High performance liquid chromatography—HPLC. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2021 Aug;99(8):1663-82.

11. Gupta D, Bhardwaj S, Sethi S, Pramanik S, Das DK, Kumar R, Singh PP, Vashistha VK. Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of drug components from their dosage formulations. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2022 Apr 5;270:120819.

12. Chakraborty A, Jayaseelan K. Environmentally sustainable analytical quality by design aided RP-HPLC method for the estimation of brilliant blue in commercial food samples employing a green-ultrasound-assisted extraction technique. Green Processing and Synthesis. 2023 Dec 18;12(1):20230178.

13. Kabir M, Rana MR, Debnath A. The Role of Quality Assurance in Accelerating Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Strategies for Ensuring Regulatory Compliance and Product Integrity. Journal of Angiotherapy. 2024 Dec 8;8(12):1-1.

14. Gupta S, Verma P, Mishra AP, Omar N, Mathur R. A review on novel analytical method development and validation by RP-HPLC method. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2021 Sep 5;15(4):3479-86.

15. McMahon ME, Abbott A, Babayan Y, Carhart J, Chen CW, Debie E, Fu M, Hoaglund-Hyzer C, Lennard A, Li H, Mazzeo T. Considerations for updates to ICH Q1 and Q5C stability guidelines: Embracing current technology and risk assessment strategies. The AAPS journal. 2021 Oct;23:1-9.

16. Kumari A, Bajwa N, Singh PA, Sachdeva V, Tamana, Joshi G. Quality by Design in Relation to clinical trials. InIntroduction to Quality by Design (QbD) From Theory to Practice 2024 Apr 10 (pp. 353-417). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

17. Anklam E, Bahl MI, Ball R, Beger RD, Cohen J, Fitzpatrick S, Girard P, Halamoda-Kenzaoui B, Hinton D, Hirose A, Hoeveler A. Emerging technologies and their impact on regulatory science. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 2022 Jan;247(1):1-75.

18. Faiella G, Parand A, Franklin BD, Chana P, Cesarelli M, Stanton NA, Sevdalis N. Expanding healthcare failure mode and effect analysis: A composite proactive risk analysis approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2018 Jan 1;169:117-26.

19. Rahman, S.N.R., Katari, O., Pawde, D.M., Boddeda, G.S.B., Goswami, A., Mutheneni, S.R. and Shunmugaperumal, T., 2021. Application of design of experiments® approach-driven artificial intelligence and machine learning for systematic optimization of reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography method to analyze simultaneously two drugs (cyclosporin A and etodolac) in solution, human plasma, nanocapsules, and emulsions. AAPS PharmSciTech, 22(4), p.155.

20. Darwish IA, Alzoman NZ. Development of green and high throughput microplate reader-assisted universal microwell spectrophotometric assay for direct determination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in their pharmaceutical formulations irrespective the diversity of their chemical structures. Molecules. 2023 May 12;28(10):4049.

21. Chen J, Peng H, Han G, Cai H, Cai J. HOGMMNC: a higher order graph matching with multiple network constraints model for gene–drug regulatory modules identification. Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 15;35(4):602-10.

22. Babar AV, Jain G, Patel J, Sharma R, Khan S, Patel R. QbD approach in HPLC method development and validation of tamoxifen. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Medicine. 2022;7(9):90-105.

23. Semail NF, Abdul Keyon AS, Saad B, Noordin SS, Nik Mohamed Kamal NN, Mohamad Zain NN, Azizi J, Kamaruzaman S, Yahaya N. Analytical method development and validation of anticancer agent, 5-fluorouracil, and its metabolites in biological matrices: An updated review. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies. 2020 Oct 1;43(15-16):562-79.

24. Chowdhury PR, Medhi H, Bhattacharyya KG, Hussain CM. Guidelines to establish the quality assurance, analytical parameters, and inter-laboratory studies. InSample Handling and Trace Analysis of Pollutants 2025 Jan 1 (pp. 435-455). Elsevier Science.

25. PS S, Trivedi RK, Srinivas NR, Mullangi R. A review of bioanalytical methods for chronic lymphocytic leukemia drugs and metabolites in biological matrices. Biomedical Chromatography. 2020 Jan;34(1):e4742.

26. Hrichi H, Kouki N, Tar H. Analytical methods for the quantification of cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin in various matrices over the last two decades. Current Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022 Jun 1;18(5):455-90.

27. Bas A, Burns N, Gulotta A, Junker J, Drasler B, Lehner R, Aicher L, Constant S, Petri‐Fink A, Rothen‐Rutishauser B. Understanding the development, standardization, and validation process of alternative in vitro test methods for regulatory approval from a researcher perspective. Small. 2021 Apr;17(15):2006027.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-23