A Meta-Analysis of Multimodal Non-Drug Interventions for Depression in Adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v27i2.249Keywords:
Depression, Non-Pharmacological Interventions, Meta-Analysis, Exercise Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Psychiatric RehabilitationAbstract
Background: Depression affects over 264 million people globally and is projected to become the leading cause of disease burden by 2030. While pharmacotherapy remains a cornerstone of treatment, limitations including side effects, adherence issues, and treatment resistance necessitate exploration of alternative therapies. Multimodal non-pharmacological interventions encompassing psychological, behavioral, and lifestyle approaches—are increasingly recognized as valuable components of depression care. Objectives: This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of non-drug interventions, including exercise therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), nature-assisted therapy, and psychosocial rehabilitation, in reducing depressive symptoms among adults. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of six databases identified randomized controlled trials and controlled cohort studies published between 2013 and 2024. Studies included adult participants diagnosed with depression and compared structured non-pharmacological interventions to treatment-as-usual or minimal intervention. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Five studies met inclusion criteria (N = 965). The pooled SMD was –0.27 (95% CI: –0.40 to –0.14), indicating a small-to-moderate but statistically significant effect favoring intervention groups. Exercise-based therapies showed the strongest and most consistent effects (SMD = –0.39), followed by psychosocial rehabilitation (–0.25), nature-assisted therapy (–0.20), and digital CBT (–0.10). Heterogeneity was moderate (I² = 48.1%), and no significant publication bias was detected. Conclusion: Non-pharmacological interventions can effectively reduce depressive symptoms, particularly when exercise is incorporated. These therapies offer viable alternatives or complements to medication, supporting holistic and patient-centered approaches in psychiatric rehabilitation. Further research should explore long-term outcomes and optimize intervention integration in diverse healthcare settings
References
1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2. Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Carlbring, P., Riper, H., & Hedman, E. (2014). Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry, 13(3), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20151
3. Annerstedt, M., & Währborg, P. (2011). Nature-assisted therapy: Systematic review of controlled and observational studies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810396400
4. Bandelow, B., Baldwin, D. S., & Michaelis, S. (2015). Common methodological pitfalls in antidepressant trials. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/13651501.2014.971142
5. Birnbaumer, D., et al. (2024). Exercise interventions and depressive symptoms in inpatient settings. Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 18(1), 23–35.
6. Birnbaumer, P., Traunmüller, C., Natmessnig, C., Senft, B., Jaritz, C., Hochfellner, S., & Hofmann, P. (2024). Changes in exercise performance in patients during a 6-week inpatient psychiatric rehabilitation program and associated effects on depressive symptoms. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 9(4), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9040233
7. Cipriani, A., et al. (2018). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet, 391(10128), 1357–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7
8. Coventry, P. A., Bower, P., Keyworth, C., Kenning, C., Knopp, J., Garrett, C.,& Dickens, C. (2013). The effect of complex interventions on depression and anxiety in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 8(4), e60532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060532
9. Coventry, P. A., et al. (2013). Integrated primary care for patients with depression and chronic conditions: Multicentre RCT. The Lancet, 382(9900), 951–961.
10. Cuijpers, P., Andersson, G., Donker, T., & van Straten, A. (2013). Psychological treatment of depression: Results of a series of meta-analyses. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 65(6), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2011.596570
11. Cuijpers, P., et al. (2013). A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(8), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.001
12. DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
13. Gartlehner, G., Gaynes, B. N., Amick, H. R., Asher, G., Morgan, L. C., Coker-Schwimmer, E., ... & Lohr, K. N. (2017). Comparative benefits and harms of antidepressant, psychological, complementary, and exercise treatments for major depression: an evidence report for a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 167(6), 454–468.
14. Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
15. Kooistra, L. C., et al. (2019). Blended CBT versus traditional CBT: Cost-effectiveness in mental healthcare. Journal of Affective Disorders, 245, 112–121.
16. Kooistra, L. C., Wiersma, J. E., Ruwaard, J., Neijenhuijs, K., Lokkerbol, J., van Oppen, P., ... & Riper, H. (2019). Cost and effectiveness of blended versus standard cognitive behavioral therapy for outpatients with depression in routine specialized mental health care: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e14261. https://doi.org/10.2196/14261
17. Mikkelsen, K., Stojanovska, L., Polenakovic, M., Bosevski, M., & Apostolopoulos, V. (2017). Exercise and mental health. Maturitas, 106, 48–56.
18. Moreno, C., et al. (2020). How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(9), 813–824.
19. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
20. Richards, D. A., et al. (2018). Enhanced psychological care in cardiac rehabilitation: A pilot trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 213(2), 456–462.
21. Richards, S. H., Dickens, C., Anderson, R., Richards, D. A., Taylor, R. S., Ukoumunne, O. C.,& Campbell, J. (2018). Assessing the effectiveness of enhanced psychological care for patients with depressive symptoms attending cardiac rehabilitation compared with treatment as usual (CADENCE): A pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials, 19, 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2576-9
22. Sansone, R. A., & Sansone, L. A. (2012). Antidepressant adherence: are patients taking their medications? Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 9(5–6), 41–46.
23. Schuch, F. B., et al. (2016). Exercise as a treatment for depression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 77, 42–51.
24. Schuch, F. B., Vancampfort, D., Firth, J., Rosenbaum, S., Ward, P. B., Silva, E. S.,& Stubbs, B. (2016). Physical activity and incident depression: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(7), 631–648.
25. Stanton, R., et al. (2020). Exercise and depression: Current perspectives. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 19(6), 254–260.
26. Stanton, R., Happell, B., & Reaburn, P. (2020). Exercise for mental illness: a practical guide. Springer.
27. Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I.,& Higgins, J. P. T. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
28. Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2013). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
29. World Health Organization. (2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates. Geneva: WHO.
30. World Health Organization. (2020). Mental health and COVID 19. https://www.who.int
31. World Health Organization. (2020). Mental Health Atlas 2020. Geneva: WHO Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License permitting all use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
