Statistical Study On Diabetes Mellitus Type-2 Of Certain Population
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i1.252Keywords:
Cumulative incidence function, Competing risk analysis, Hazard ratio, Proportional Hazard Model, Survival AnalysisAbstract
This study examines the variables that contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes and compares the survival characteristics of male and female patients using a Cox proportional hazard regression model. In addition to high body weight, high blood pressure, and greater waist measures in males, the data indicate that high cholesterol, low HDL, high glucose, and low haemoglobin levels were important risk factors. The study highlights the significance of lifestyle changes, regular blood pressure, glucose, and cholesterol checks, and early intervention and prevention initiatives in tackling the high prevalence of diabetes. Type 2 diabetes patients' survival was significantly impacted by their weight, blood pressure, and waist size. The study discovered that type 2 diabetes had a higher death rate among female patients. Additionally, waist circumference was found to have a protective impact against problems related to type 2 diabetes, whereas weight and diastolic blood pressure were found to increase the risk. To look at this matter more thoroughly, other survival analysis techniques might be investigated.
References
1. Austin, P. C., Lee, D. S., & Fine, J. P. (2016). Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks. Circulation, 133(6), 601-609.
2. Cheng, L. J., Chen, J. H., Lin, M. Y., Chen, L. C., Lao, C. H., Luh, H., & Hwang, S. J. (2015). A competing risk analysis of sequential complication development in Asian type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 15687.
3. Cleves, M., Gould, W., Gould, W. W., Gutierrez, R., & Marchenko, Y. (2008). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. Stata press.
4. Kay, R. (1986). Treatment effects in competing-risks analysis of prostate cancer data. Biometrics, 203-211.
5. Klein, J. P., Van Houwelingen, H. C., Ibrahim, J. G., & Scheike, T. H. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of survival analysis. Boca Raton, FL:: CRC Press.
6. Klein, J. P., Van Houwelingen, H. C., Ibrahim, J. G., & Scheike, T. H. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of survival analysis. Boca Raton, FL:: CRC Press.
7. Kleinbaum, D. G., Klein, M., Kleinbaum, D. G., & Klein, M. (2012). Introduction to survival analysis. Survival analysis: A self-learning text, 1-54.
8. Liu, X. (2012). Survival analysis: models and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
9. Moore, D. F. (2016). Applied survival analysis using R (Vol. 473). Cham: Springer.
10. Zhang, Z. (2017). Survival analysis in the presence of competing risks. Annals of translational medicine, 5(3).
11. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life‐tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187-202.
12. Kapadia, A. S., & Kannappan, A. (2002). The Cox Proportional Hazards Model: A Review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(10), 885-892.
13. Pundir, P. S., & Gupta, P. K. (2018). Reliability estimation in load-sharing system model with application to real data. Annals of Data Science, 5, 69-91.
14. Krishna, H., & Pundir, P. S. (2009). Discrete Burr and discrete Pareto distributions. Statistical methodology, 6(2), 177-188.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License permitting all use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
