Role Of Dyadic Coping, Social Autonomy, And Resilience On Mental Health And Quality Of Life In Married Couples

Authors

  • Zahra Poonawala
  • Dr Anu Raj Singh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i4.353

Keywords:

Dyadic Coping, Social Autonomy, Relational Resilience, Social Connectedness, Mental health

Abstract

Marital relationships face increasing pressures in modern society, yet many couples lack evidence-based strategies to sustain wellbeing. This study investigates how dyadic coping, social autonomy, relational resilience, and social connectedness collectively influence mental health and quality of life among married couples. Using a cross-sectional design with 384 participants, we employed validated measures to assess these key constructs and their interrelationships. Results demonstrate that dyadic coping significantly enhances mental, while social autonomy shows a robust correlation with quality of life. Relational resilience emerges as a critical protective factor, mediating the impact of stressors on marital satisfaction. Social connectedness further amplifies these benefits, strengthening the relationship between resilience and quality of life. Gender differences reveal women benefit more from dyadic coping, while men show greater gains from social autonomy. The findings challenge conventional approaches to couples therapy by demonstrating that effective interventions must simultaneously address both individual (autonomy, resilience) and relational (dyadic coping, connectedness) dimensions. This research provides empirically validated results for strengthening marriages, particularly in high-stress environments, offering couples concrete pathways to enhance both personal fulfillment and relationship quality.

Author Biographies

Zahra Poonawala

Research Scholar, Banasthali Vidyapith

Dr Anu Raj Singh

Assistant Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith

References

Akyıl, Y. (2024). Parallel Mediators between Resilience, Mindfulness and Social Connectedness : Entrapment and Intolerance of Uncertainty. 1–12.

2. Alves, S., Fonseca, A., Canavarro, M. C., & Pereira, M. (2020). Does Dyadic Coping Predict Couples’ Postpartum Psychosocial Adjustment? A Dyadic Longitudinal Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(September), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2020.561091

3. Atoki, P. L., & Gautam, R. (2024). Self-Compassion And Its Role In Enhancing Mental Health And Resilience Among Married Couples. 12(3), 912–932.

4. Aydogan, D., & Dincer, D. (2020). Creating resilient marriage relationships: Self-pruning and the mediation role sacrifice with satisfaction. Current Psychology, 39(2), 500–510. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12144-019-00472-x

5. Aydogan, D., Kara, E., & Kalkan, E. (2021). Understanding relational Resilience of married adults in quarantine days. Current Psychology, 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02224 -2

6. Azza Medhat Aziz Mansy , Ayman Mohamed El-Ashry , Soheir Mohammed Ahmed Ali, L. A. E.-H. A. A. (2024). Mediation Role of Psychological Resilience on The Relationship between Perfectionism and Marital Adjustment Among Undergraduate Nursing Students. Penambahan Natrium Benzoat Dan Kalium Sorbat (Antiinversi) Dan Kecepatan Pengadukan Sebagai Upaya Penghambatan Reaksi Inversi Pada Nira Tebu.

7. Chen, C., Sun, X., Liu, Z., Jiao, M., Wei, W., & Hu, Y. (2023). The relationship between Resilience and quality of life in advanced cancer survivors: multiple mediating effects of social support and spirituality. Frontiers in Public Health, 11(August), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpubh.2023.1207097

8. Cihan, H., & Aydogan, D. (2020). Relational Resilience as a protective factor in marital adjustment of couples with cancer: A dyadic model. Dusunen Adam - The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 33(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.14744/DAJPNS.2020.00092

9. Erg, M. S. M. D. M. R. S. S. D. (2024). The Mediating Role of Connectedness in the Relationship Between Authenticity and Mental Health Symptoms. Αγαη, 15(1), 37–48.

10. Falconier, M. K., & Kuhn, R. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAR), 1–23. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571

11. Fallahchai, R., Fallahi, M., & Randall, A. K. (2019). A dyadic approach to understanding associations between job stress, marital quality, and dyadic coping for dual-career couples in Iran. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(APR), 1–11. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00487

12. Farah Qadir, Amna Khalid, Sabahat Haqqani, Z.-H. & G. M. (2019). The association of marital relationship and perceived social support with mental health of women in Pakistan. BMC Public Health.

13. Haghighi, P., Littler, E. A. L., Mauer-Vakil, D., Miller, M., & Oremus, M. (2024). Exploring the relationship between marital quality and cognitive function: A systematic review. Social Science and Medicine, 355(April), 117120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117120

14. Landolt, S. A., Weitkamp, K., Roth, M., Sisson, N. M., & Bodenmann, G. (2023). Dyadic coping and mental health in couples: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 106(September), 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102344

15. Olasupo, M. O., Idemudia, E. S., & Kareem, D. B. (2021). Moderated mediation roles of social Connectedness and optimism on emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Heliyon, 7(5), e07029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07029

16. Oz-Soysal, F. S., Bakalım, O., Tasdelen-Karckay, A., & Ogan, S. (2024). The Association Between Autonomy Need Satisfaction and Perceived Romantic Relationship Quality: The Mediating Role of Openness. Emerging Adulthood, 12(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231220074

17. Parsakia, K., Rostami, M., & Saadati, S. M. (2024). Journal of Psychosociological Research in Family and Culture. SSRN Electronic Journal, September. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4935087

18. Qasim, A., & Muzaffar, R. (2021). Emotional Abuse as a Predictor of Mental Health Problems among Married Individuals and its impact on their Quality of Life. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 8(4), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.500.2021.84.92.101

19. Ranganathan, T., & Mendonca, A. (2023). Does being Educated more than the Spouse give Women Higher Autonomy? Findings from India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 66(3), 833–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-023-00448-3

20. Roth, A. R. (2021). Social Autonomy among Married Men and Women. Socius, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211043630

21. Rustamov, E., Musayeva, T., Xalilova, X., Ismayilova, G., & Nahmatova, U. (2023). Exploring the relationship between social Connectedness and mental wellbeing: the mediating role of psychological Resilience among adults in Azerbaijan. Discover Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-023-00080-8

22. Shah, P. C. (2024). Relationship between Relationship Satisfaction, Resilience, Optimism, and Forgiveness among Young Married Couples in India. 12(2). https://doi.org/10.25215/ 1202.302

23. Song, W., Zhang, X., Ge, S., Zhai, Q., Shan, Q., Li, X., Mei, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2024). The Relationship Between Dyadic Coping and Mental Health in Stroke Survivors and Their Spouse Caregivers: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Journal of Clinical Nursing, October. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17478

24. Steckermeier, L. C. (2021). The Value of Autonomy for the Good Life. An Empirical Investigation of Autonomy and Life Satisfaction in Europe. In Social Indicators Research (Vol. 154, Issue 2). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11205-020-02565-8

25. Ştefǎnuţ, A. M., Vintilǎ, M., & Tudorel, O. I. (2021). The Relationship of Dyadic Coping With Emotional Functioning and Quality of the Relationship in Couples Facing Cancer—A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.594015

26. Tang, N., Pei, M., Xie, L., Liang, X., Hu, J., & Gao, Y. (2023). Relationship Between Dyadic Coping with Anxiety and Depression in Infertile Couples: Gender Differences and Dyadic Interaction. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16(October), 4909–4919. https://doi.org/10. 2147/PRBM.S437808

27. Ummah, M. S. (2019). WHO Quality of Life Scale-Brief. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1–14. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI

28. Valikhani, A., Ahmadnia, F., Karimi, A., & Mills, P. J. (2019). The relationship between dispositional gratitude and quality of life: The mediating role of perceived stress and mental health. Personality and Individual Differences, 141(April 2018), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid. 2018.12.014

29. Wang, Y., & Umberson, D. (2022). Dyadic coping and marital quality in same-sex and different-sex marriages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 996–1017. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/02654075221123096

30. Wójcik, G., Zawisza, K., Jabłońska, K., Grodzicki, T., & Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B. (2021). Transition out of Marriage and its Effects on Health and Health–Related Quality of Life among Females and Males. COURAGE and COURAGE-POLFUS–Population Based Follow-Up Study in Poland. In Applied Research in Quality of Life (Vol. 16, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09742-z

31. Zhang, Q., & Cao, H. (2024). Relationships between dyadic coping, marital adjustment, and post-traumatic growth in patients with maintenance hemodialysis patients and their spouses. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1487355

Downloads

Published

2025-04-29