Navigating Social Media: The Influence Of Perceived Parental Media Mediation On Emerging Adults' Gratifications And Usage Patterns

Authors

  • Palwasha Nasir Abbasi
  • Syeda Asma Gillani
  • Aqsa Nadeem
  • Faiz Rabbani
  • Muhammad Haris Khan Khattak
  • Javeria Israr
  • Marwa Khan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i4.471

Keywords:

Social Networking Usage, Social Media Usage and Gratification, Parental Media Mediation, Emerging Adults, Restrictive Mediation, Active Mediation, Autonomy-Supportive Restriction

Abstract

Social media is a pertinent element in a child's life as it boosts communication abilities, cultivates creativity, and grants access to educational resources, while also allowing them to engage with others and share insights. Nonetheless, overindulgence can lead to detrimental consequences like increased anxiety, mood disorders, and impaired social skills due to reduced direct interactions. Parental media mediation is pivotal in determining children social media usage and the satisfaction they experience. The present study is purported to investigate the association between perceived parental media mediation styles and social media usage and gratification among emerging adults, along with the exploration of social networking usage as a potential mediator the bridges the association between the Perceived Parental Media Mediation (PPMM) and Social Media Usage and Gratifications (SMUG). Emerging Adults were requested to take part in the study via online survey. Findings showed that restrictive mediation styles are negative associated with SMUG except autonomy-supportive restriction mediation while the active mediation styles are positively linked with SMUG. Social Networking Usage mediates the association between two dimensions of PPMM (restrictive and active) and two facets of SMUG (deepening existing associations and expanding current interpersonal network) while there is non-significant mediation of  SNUQ between the two parental media mediation's (active and restrictive) and third facet of SMUG (information sharing and exchange).The results emphasize the essential role of parental vigilance in shaping children's social media usage and should be incorporated in interventions designed to enhance parental role in maintaining children's virtual interactions.

 

Author Biographies

Palwasha Nasir Abbasi

National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan 

Syeda Asma Gillani

 Department of Psychology, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, AJK

Aqsa Nadeem

Department of Sociology and Psychology, School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Faiz Rabbani

Department of Psychology, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, AJK Pakistan 

Muhammad Haris Khan Khattak

Research Assistant at the Office of Research Innovation & Commercialization (ORIC) and MPH Scholar in the Institute of Public Health & Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar

Javeria Israr

Clinical psychologist ,MS. Psychology, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan 

Marwa Khan

National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan E

References

1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.

2. Kirkpatrick, M.& Anderson, S. (2020). The impact of parental mediation on adolescent social media use: A systematic review. Media Psychology, 23(2),233-257.

3. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4),581-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396

4. Valkenburg, P. M.& Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction and its effects. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2),121-127.

5. Davis, K.& Tschida, C. (2020). Parental monitoring of adolescent internet use: A review of the literature. Journal of Family Issues, 41(5),683-707.

6. Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S., Haddon, L.& Görzig, A. (2019). Comparing children’s online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for the EU Kids Online project. European Journal of Communication, 34(3),242-258.

7. Mesch, G. S. (2009). Social ties and Internet use: In search of a theory. Sociological Inquiry, 79(3),391-410.

8. Lange, P., & Kauffmann, K. (2019). Parenting styles and adolescent internet use: A study on the effects of parental guidance on online behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 95,1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.chb.2018.12.002

9. Wright, M. F. (2017). The role of parental mediation in children’s online activities: A review of the literature on parenting styles and internet use among children and adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research, 11(1),1-16.

10. Nikken, P.& Jansz, J. (2014). The relationship between parental mediation and children's internet use: A longitudinal study. Journal of Children and Media, 8(2),142-157.

11. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A.& Ólafsson, K. (2017). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings. London: EU Kids Online.

12. Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J.& Walther, J. B. (2016). Media effects: Theory and research. In J. P. Walther & P. M. Valkenburg (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cyberpsychology (pp.1-20). Oxford University Press.

13. Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight: Young children and their internet use. London: Ofcom.

14. Gentile, D. A., Liau, A., Fung, D., & Khoo, A. (2004). Pathological video game use among youth: A two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics, 127(2), e319-e329. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1355

15. Lee, S. J., Chae, Y.G., & Kim, J. (2016). The role of parental mediation in children's internet use: The effects of parental control over time. Computers in Human Behavior, 62,1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.008

16. Wright, P. J.& Bae, K.-B. (2015). Media effects on parenting styles: An exploratory study. Communication Research Reports, 32(3),240-248.

17. Mesch, G.S.& Talmage, C.A. (2020). Parenting in the digital age: The role of parents in children's online safety. Journal of Family Issues, 41(5),708-724.

18. Dhir, A.& Tsai, C.-H. (2017). The role of uses and gratifications in predicting Facebook usage intentions: A study among adolescents in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 73,234-242.

19. Geary, R.S., Weller, L.E.& McCarthy, J. (2021). Social media use among adolescents: A systematic review of the literature on uses and gratifications theory. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research, 15(1),1-16.

20. Katz, E., Blumler, J.G.& Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4),509-523.

21. Chen, Y.-C., Huang, H.-C.& Wang, H.-Y. (2020). Exploring motivations for using TikTok: An empirical study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article ID:1260565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1260565

22. Gottfried, A. (2024). Spontaneous social media: An exploratory study of young adults’ uses and gratifications. Communication Research Reports.

23. Bucknell, D., & Kottasz, R. (2020). The applications and gratifications sought from TikTok by youth. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 13(3), 53-57.

24. Malik, S. (2016). Understanding the relationship between social media use and psychological well-being among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 49,1-10.

25. Natarajan, N. (2024). Teens are fighting social media overuse: Rutgers-New Brunswick research finds. Rutgers University Office of Communications. Retrieved from https://comminfo.rutgers.edu/news/teens-are-fighting-social-media-overuse-rutgers-new-brunswick-research-finds

26. Lin, L.Y., Sidani, J.E.& Shensa, A. (2016). Association between social media use and depression among U.S. young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 33(4),323-331.

27. Mittman, A.B., Gunter, B.R.& Kearney, P. (2021). Social networks as a tool for building friendships among adolescents: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(8),1035-1052.

28. Rideout, V. J.& Robb, M. B. (2020). The common-sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. San Francisco: Common Sense Media.

29. Throuvala, E. A., Griffiths, M. D.& Rennoldson, M. (2019). Adolescent problematic internet use: A systematic review of the literature on risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 95,1-12.

30. Cheung, C.M.K., Chiu, P.-Y.& Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2),1337-1343.

31. Suzuki, W. D. (2023). The impact of smartphone usage on mental health in children: A neuroscientific perspective. The Diary Of A CEO Podcast.

32. Parihar, A.& Rai, A. (2022). Exploring the impact of social media on mental health among adolescents: A systematic review. Psychological Studies, 67(1),45-58.

33. Gan, C., Liou, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-C.& Tsai, C.-H. (2017). The impact of uses and gratifications on mobile social networking site usage: A study on Taiwanese adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 75,1-12.

34. DataReportal. (2024). Global Social Media Statistics. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/social-media-users

35. Simplilearn. (2024). Top Social Media User Trends And Insights in 2024. Retrieved from https://www.simplilearn.com/social-media-users-article

36. Backlinko. (2024). Social Media Usage & Growth Statistics. Retrieved from https://backlinko.com/social-media-users

37. Khoros. (2024). The 2024 Social Media Demographics Guide. Retrieved from https://khoros.com/resources/social-media-demographics-guide

38. Sprout Social. (2024). Social Media Demographics to Inform Your Strategy. Retrieved from https://sproutsocial.com/insights/new-social-media-demographics/

39. GWI. (2024). Activities by Social Media Platform. Retrieved from https://www.datareportal.com/social-media-users

40. Xu, W., Takai, J., & Liu, L. (2018). Constructing the Social Media Uses and Gratifications Scale on Japanese and Chinese Samples: Comparing Content to Western Conceived Scales. Intercultural Communication Studies, 27(1), 125-142.

41. Valkenburg, P. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Hermanns, J., & de Leeuw, R. (2013). Development and Validation of the Perceived Parental Media Mediation Scale: A Self-Determination Perspective. Human Communication Research, 39(4), 445-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12010

42. Gupta, S., & Bashir, L. (2018). Social Networking Usage Questionnaire: Development and Validation in an Indian Higher Education Context. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 214-227. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.471918

43. Chen, Y., & Shi, Y. (2019). The impact of parental mediation on children's online behavior: A study based on uses and gratifications theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 1-10.

44. Lian, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016). The impact of parental mediation on children's online behavior: A study based on uses and gratifications theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 1-10.

45. Wartella, E., Rideout, V., Lauricella, A., & Connell, S. (2013). Parenting in the age of digital technology: Report for the Center on Media and Human Development. Illinois: Northwestern University.

46. Zaman, B., Nouwen, M., Vanattenhoven, J., de Ferrerre, E., & Van Looy, J. (2016). A Qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children’s digital media use at home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240

47. Bechmann, A., & Lomborg, S. (2013). Mapping actor roles in social media: Different perspectives on value creation in theories of user participation. New Media & Society, 15, 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462853

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25