“Evaluation Of Response Reduction Factor For High Rise Irregular RC Building Structure”

Authors

  • Mr. Samadhan Naganath Gaikwad
  • Dr. M. M. Pawar
  • Dr. M. G. Deshmukh
  • Prof. P. B. Ronge
  • Prof. Kirti Bhosale

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i3.571

Keywords:

Vertical irregularity, Plan irregularity, over strength factor, Pushover analysis, zone factor, ductility factor, and design basis shear response reduction factor

Abstract

The prime purpose of evaluation of response reduction factor  for high rise irregular RC building structure by considering various factors into account. As we are aware about that there is significant difference in  The forces that are produced during earthquake than the structure is actually to be made in order to with stand against these forces. We cannot de sign the structures for real values of seismic forces as it is uneconomical from various  aspects. Is a necessity to minimum the actual severity of earthquake and to achieve this, The response reduction factor is applied. It is the amount that should be subtracted from the actual base shear force in order to achieve the design lateral force during the shaking of the design basic earthquake (DBE). The main factors influencing the response reduction factor (R) include over strength (Rs), ductility (Rµ),Redundancy (RR).There is no explanation given in (IS: 1893-2000) code for various Response reduction factor values Used in, so it is difficult to precede  the execution  of seismic design without firm basis. Also Regarding various factors like over-strength and ductility, IS code does not separate the component explicitly of the response reduction factor (R). In the current work, an attempt has been made to assess the actual value of the response reduction factor for RC buildings with irregular plans, building height variations, and the impact of different seismic zones. Additionally, non-linear static pushover analysis using SAP2000 is used  to compare in terms of important factor, type of foundation soil, and lateral load resisting system. The results are  compared with values provided in IS code 1893(2000). IS 456:2000 requirements were followed in the design of the frames? The lateral loads operating on the frames were extracted from IS 1893:2002 (Part 1) requirements.

Author Biographies

Mr. Samadhan Naganath Gaikwad

Post-Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, SVERI‘s College of Engineering, Pandharpur,

Dr. M. M. Pawar

Associate Professor, SVERI‘s College of Engineering, Pandharpur

Dr. M. G. Deshmukh

Professor, SVERI‘s College of Engineering, Pandharpur

Prof. P. B. Ronge

Assitant  Professor, SVERI‘s College of Engineering, Pandharpur

Prof. Kirti Bhosale

Assistant Professor, SVIT Solapur

References

1. Denis Mitchell ‘’Ductility and over strength in seismic design of reinforced concrete structures’’. Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Mc Gill University, 817 Sherbrook Street West, Montreal QCH3A2K6, Canada .May,1994.

2. Chi-Chang Lin , Jin-Min Ueng, Teng-Ching Huang "Using passive tuned mass to reduce seismic response in irregular buildings dampers’’ Engineering Structures 513–524 Department of Civil Engineering, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC, 40227, volume2(1999)

3. S.Chan-Esquivel ‘’Over strength f elements for the seismic design of AAC structures’’ .Av. Industries No Contaminants s/n por Anillo Periférico Norte, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico.C.P.93710. |2012|

4. Vijay Namdev Khose ‘’A Comparative Study of Design Shear Base for RC Buildings in Selected Seismic Design Codes’’. Article in Earthquake Spectra·August2012

5. Kruti Tamboli, J. A. Amin's "analysis of the RC Braced Frame's Response Reduction Factor and Ductility Factor." 2015 Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Institute of Technology, Vasad, India, Department of Civil Engineering.

6. Tia Toby, Ajesh K. Kottuppillil "Nonlinear Analysis for Response Reduction Factor Evaluation." International JIRST Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology|Volume2 | Issue 06 | November 2015.

7. Bholebhavi Rahul D. and Inamdar V.M. ‘’An Assessment of the Seismic Response Reduction Factor for Non-Linear Static Structures Analysis’ ’International Innovative Research in Science, Engineering, and Technology Journal Technology, Vol.5, Issue5,May2016

8. N. U. Mate ‘’Elastic and in elastic Response of Structural Systems in Seismic Pounding’’. Civil Engineering Department, Amrutvahini College of Engineering, Sangamner, India, published 29 February2016.

9. Keerthi S. and Vivek Philip "Reaction Reduction Factor Evaluation" Redundancy- based for high-rise Buildings’'. Engineering and Technology Research Journal (IRJET), Volume: 04 Issue: 05 |May-2017

10. Prashant R. Barbude, Amol S. Jadhav, Dr. T.N.Boob ‘’Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor for Reinforced Concrete Frames With Shear Wall’’. © 2017 IJCRT .ISSN:2320-2882 IJCRT 1704080, | Volume 5, Issue 4 October2017|

11. Ruhullah Amiri and T. N. Patel ‘’Assessment of Seismic Response Reduction Factor According to Redundancy of RC Buildings’’, Online ISSN: 2394- 4099 Themed Section: Engineering and Technology .IJSRSET. Print ISSN: 2395- 1990|Volume4|Issue4|2018

12. Jagat Kumar Shrestha ‘’Response Reduction Factor for Masonry Buildings’’. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology (NJST) (2020),.Department of Civil Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Institute of Engineering, Tribhuvan University, Nepal, 19(1):196- 203,2020

13. 13.IS 13920: 1993, Ductile Detailing Of. Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected To Seismic Forces.- CodeOf Practice.UDC69.059.25(026).

14. ATC40 (1996) “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of existing concrete buildings”, Applied Technical Council, Redwood City (CA),1996

15. Jisha P. Sharjuban “Seismic Response Reduction Factor’. Evaluation for Irregular RC Structures” ,International Journal of Engineering Research &Technology

Downloads

Published

2025-03-11