Digital Impressions Redefined: The Role of Intraoral Scanners in Modern Prosthodontics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i5.584Keywords:
Intraoral scanners, Accuracy, Time efficiencyAbstract
Intraoral scanners have revolutionized the field of dentistry by providing a more efficient, accurate and patient-friendly alternative to traditional dental impressions. This article explore the advancements in intraoral scanning technology and its impact on digital impressions and restorations.
Discussion
It highlights the revolutionary effect these technologies have on modern dentistry, emphasizing the benefits they offer in terms of precision, effectiveness, patient experience, collaboration, integration with CAD/CAM technology and general practice success. The use of intraoral scanners into workflows in dental practices, with a focus on how these devices might improve communication between dental practitioners and laboratories and streamline procedures.
Summary
An intraoral scanner is a digital dental tool that captures precise 3D images of a patient's teeth and gums. It enhances diagnostic accuracy, improves treatment planning, and streamlines workflows, replacing traditional impressions with faster, more comfortable, and efficient scanning methods.
Conclusion
An intraoral scanners has shed light on the significant advancements and benefits that these devices bring to the field of dentistry. By improving accuracy, reducing turnaround times, and enhancing patient comfort, intraoral scanners have revolutionized the way dental professionals capture impressions and collaborate with laboratories.
References
Schaefer O, Schmidt M, Goebel R, Kuepper H. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; Sep;108(3):165-72.
2. Martin CB, Chalmers E V., McIntyre GT, Cochrane H, Mossey PA. Orthodontic scanners: What’s available? J Orthod. 2015; Jun;42(2):136-43.
3. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):1–11.
4. Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al. Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;8427595.
5. Susic I, Travar M, Susic M. The application of CAD / CAM technology in Dentistry. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2017;200(1).
6. Abad C. Intraoral Scanning Devices Applied in Fixed Prosthodontics. Acta Sci Dent Sci. 2019;3(7):44–51.
7. Ting S, Jian S. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(4):313–21.
8. Park HS, Shah C. Development of high speed and high accuracy 3D dental intra oral scanner 2015;1001174–81.
9. Al-jubouri O, Azari A. Article An introduction to dental digitizers in dentistry ; systematic review. J Chem Pharm Res. 2015;7(8):10–20.
10. Hack GD, Patzelt M. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Six Intraoral Scanning. Am Dent EVOLUTION OF INTRAORAL SCANNERS IN DENTISTRY: AN OVERVIEW Section A -Research paper 4276 Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (Special Issue7), 4267-4276 Assoc. 2015;10(4):1–5.
11. Aswani K, Wankhade S, Khalikar A, Deogade S. Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2020;20(1):27-37
12. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(7):1759–64.
13. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent2010;38(7):553–9.
14. Marques S, Ribeiro P, Falc C, Lemos BF, Blanca R. Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry : A Literature Review. 2021; 18(3):1020.
15. Son K, Lee KB. Effect of tooth types on the accuracy of Dental 3D Scanners: An in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(7):23–5.
16. Henry H. An Overview of Digital Intraoral Scanners: Past, Present and Future- From an Orthodontic Perspective.Taiwanese Journal of Orthodontics: Vol. 30 : Iss. 3.
17. Bocklet C, Renne W, Mennito A, Bacro T, Latham J, Evans Z. Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2019;22(S1):168–74.
18. Ueda Y, Yamaguchi T. History of and current situation regarding dental CAD/CAM systems and future perspectives. J Dent Sci. 2017;38(38):104–10.
19. D’Arienzo LF, D’Arienzo A, Borracchini A. Comparison of the suitability of intra-oral scanning with conventional impression of edentulous maxilla in vivo. A preliminary study. J Osseointegration. 2018;10(4):115–20.
20. Baheti M, Soni U, Mahagaonkar P, Khokhani R, Dash S. Intra-oral Scanners : A New Eye in Dentistry. Austin J Orthop Rheumatol. 2015;2(3):1–6.
21. Chiu A, Chen YW, Hayashi J, Sadr A. Accuracy of CAD/CAM digital impressions with different intraoral scanner parameters. Sensors (Switzerland). 2020;20(4).
22. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The Use of CAD/CAM in Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(3):559–70
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License permitting all use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
