A Comparative Study Of The Quality Assurance Practices In Public And Private Higher Educational Institutes

Abstract

This study examined the quality assurance practices in public and private higher education institutions. The research focused on assessing their alignment with Total Quality Management (TQM) principles and standards set by the Higher Education Commission (HEC). Data were collected through structured questionnaires targeting faculty members and students from both public and private institutions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and sample t-tests to identify significant differences in the implementation of quality assurance practices. The findings highlighted key differences between public and private institutions. Public sector institutions were found to excel in areas such as course evaluation and incorporating feedback, while private sector institutions performed relatively better in providing updated learning materials and skill-oriented programs. However, both sectors faced common challenges, such as inconsistent government policies, lack of staff training, and insufficient commitment from management, which hindered the effective implementation of quality assurance measures. The study emphasized the significance of stakeholder participation, regular program evaluations, and constructive feedback as essential components of a robust quality assurance system. Although some elements of TQM, such as continuous improvement, were observed, there remains a need for further integration of these principles into institutional practices. This research contributes to a better understanding of the current state of quality assurance practices in higher education institutions. The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and academic leaders to strengthen educational standards.