Bridging Legal Frameworks And Grassroots Realities: A Critical Appraisal Of India’s Geographical Indications Scheme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i1.726Keywords:
Geographical Indications, Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge, Rural Development, GI Protection SchemeAbstract
The concept of Geographical Indications (GIs) has emerged as a significant form of intellectual property, offering unique branding and legal protection to products intrinsically linked to specific geographic origins. Rooted in international frameworks such as the TRIPS Agreement and the Paris Convention, GIs encapsulate cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and regional identity. The Indian Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, aims to promote rural development and economic empowerment by safeguarding the identity of goods like Darjeeling Tea or Banarasi Sarees. Despite registering over 400 GIs, disparities persist among Indian states, with many lagging in registrations due to administrative bottlenecks, legal ambiguities, financial constraints, and low public awareness. This paper critically analyses India’s GI scheme, highlighting the legal framework, socio-economic implications, and structural challenges. It proposes reforms such as expediting registration processes, enhancing financial and legal support for artisans, regional decentralisation, and integration with tourism and digital marketing. These strategies aim to strengthen GI implementation and ensure equitable benefit-sharing. The GI framework, if inclusively and effectively enforced, can become a catalyst for local innovation, rural upliftment, and global brand recognition of India’s rich traditional products.
References
Blakeney Michael, (2017).Geographical Indications and Traditional Knowledge, 50(1) Q.J. INT’L TRADE L. & POL’Y 162
Cardoso Hugo (2022).et al., Protection of Geographical Indications in Emerging Economies: Lessons from India, 19(3) WIPO J. 707
Glogovețan Andreea (2022).et al., Historical Evolution and Current Perspectives of Geographical Indications as Intellectual Property Rights, 10(8) SUSTAINABILITY 1667 (2022).
Rawat Nupur & Saini Youkta,(2020). Understanding the Role of GI Tags in Indian Trade: A Study on Basmati and Darjeeling, 11(3) Int’l J. Trade & Global Bus. Persp. 103
Ghosh Sandeep, (2024). Unpacking India’s GI Registration Framework: Legal Hurdles and Bureaucratic Gaps, 28(1) Indian J. L. & Tech. 12
Chaturvedi Sachin, (2019). Commercialization of GIs: Who Really Benefits?, 16(4) J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. 1
Verma Neha, (2016). Fragmented Crafts and Legal Protection: The Chikankari Challenge, THE ECONOMIC TIMES
B. Prathap & G. Sreelaksmi, (2022). Infringement and Enforcement of Geographical Indications in India: A Case-Based Study, 22(2) INDIAN J. INTELL. PROP. L. 176
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License permitting all use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
