“Nephrectomy unmasked: A nephrectomy case series through histopathology and hurdles”

Authors

  • Rupesh Bharatbhai Shah
  • Priyank Rajeshkumar Shah
  • Ketan Bhupatray Rajyaguru
  • Akash Alpesh Shah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i5.747

Keywords:

Nephrectomy, Duodenal perforation, Renal hydatid cyst

Abstract

Nephrectomy remains a cornerstone procedure in the management of various renal pathologies, both benign and malignant. This case series emphasizes the unusual pathological entities and intraoperative complexities faced during nephrectomy.  This case series aims to analyse the clinical indications, intraoperative findings, postoperative outcomes, and complications among patients who underwent nephrectomy at our hospital over the past 3 months.

Materials and Methods: We have done retrospective observational study of 15 patients who underwent nephrectomy for both benign and malignant conditions between June 1, 2025 and August 30, 2025 at Department of Urology – at our hospital. We had collected socio-demographics data, clinical details (presenting symptoms, Preoperative CT scan findings, site of disease), intraoperative findings (operative time, blood loss, surgical approach, intraoperative complications), postoperative complications, mean hospital stay duration and histopathology report. We have done follow up of patient for 3 months postoperatively.

Results: Among 15 patients (mean age-48.8 years), 9 patients (60%) underwent surgery for benign indication and 6 patients (40%) underwent surgery for malignant disease. A total of 8 patients (53.3%) underwent surgery with laparoscopic approach and 7 patients (46.7%) were underwent surgery with open approach (3 patients were converted to open surgery. Mean operative time was 160 minutes with average blood loss of 110 ml. Mean hospital stay was 4.2 days (range 3-9 days). Post operative wound infection was seen in 2 patients. We had discussed cases with xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis, communicating ruptured hydatid cyst, mixed epithelial and stromal tumour, leiomyosarcoma of kidney, renal transitional cell carcinoma in nonfunctioning pyonephrotic kidney. We have managed two cases of duodenal perforation occurring intraoperatively during right nephrectomy

Conclusion: Even in the minimally invasive era, open nephrectomy retains a vital and irreplaceable role. In our experience, judicious and patient-centered decision of timely conversion to open surgery ensures safety, complete disease control and favourable perioperative outcomes. In the current era, open nephrectomy continues to complement minimally invasive approaches rather than compete with them.

Author Biographies

Rupesh Bharatbhai Shah

Assistant professor, 

Department of Urology, SVPIMSR, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, India

Priyank Rajeshkumar Shah

Assistant professor, 

Department of Urology, SVPIMSR, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, India

Ketan Bhupatray Rajyaguru

Professor and Head

Department of Urology, SVPIMSR, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, India

Akash Alpesh Shah

 Senior Resident,

Department of Urology, SVPIMSR, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, India

References

1. Peña PA, Torres-Castellanos L, Patiño G, Prada S, Villarraga LG, Fernández N. Minimally invasive nephrectomy for infammatory renal disease. Asian journal of urology. 2020;7(4):345–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2019.09.002.

2. Hemal AK, Mishra S. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for pyonephrotic nonfunctioning kidney. Urology. 2010;75(3):585–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.054.

3. Papadopoulou A, Campain N, Abu-Ghanem Y, Shanmugathas N, Poullas M, Mumtaz F, Barod R, Tran M, Bex A, Patki P. Not-so-simple nephrectomy: Comparative analysis of radical and simple nephrectomy in a high-volume tertiary referral center. International journal of urology: official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2024;31(2):160–8.

https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15330.

4. Alsmadi JK, Nofal MN, Alriyalat S, Yousef AJ. Laparoscopic vs. Open nephrectomy for inflammatory renal conditions: a meta-analysis emphasizing safety. BMC Urol. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01781-z. PMID: 40254599; PMCID: PMC12010633.

5. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2025. Vol. 1, p. 299.

6. Gregg CR, Rogers TE, Munford RS. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis. 1999;19:287-304. PMID: 10472491.

7. Dawoud S, Solomon RJ, Eyerly-Webb SA, Abrahams NA, Pedraza F, Arenas JD, Hranjec T. Pyeloduodenal Fistula in Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis: A Series of Two Cases. Perm J. 2018;22:17-150. doi: 10.7812/TPP/17-150. PMID: 30005725; PMCID: PMC6045498.

8. Kelly C, Anderson S, Looney A, Shannon N, Senaratne R, O'Connor E, Breen K, Lennon G, McGuire B, Murphy M, Moran D, Galvin D. Nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis-a not-so-simple solution. Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;193(2):1055-1060. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03496-2. Epub 2023 Aug 23. PMID: 37610600; PMCID: PMC10961261.

9. Eckert J, Deplazes P. Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Jan;17(1):107-35. doi:10.1128/CMR.17.1.107-135. PMID: 14726458; PMCID: PMC321468

10. Gög˘üs¸ O, Bedük Y, Topukcu Z. Renal hydatid disease. Br J Urol. 1991; 68: 466-469.

11. Buckley RJ, Smith S, Herschorn S, Comisarow RH, Barkin M. Echinococcal disease of the kidney presenting as a renal filling defect. J Urol. 1985; 133: 660-661.

12. Moscatelli G, Moroni S, Freilij H, Salgueiro F, García Bournissen F, Altcheh J. A five-year-old child with renal hydatidosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Sep;89(3):554-6. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0243. Epub 2013 Jul 29. PMID: 23897992; PMCID: PMC3771299.

13. Mudholkar, Vishal G.; Suwarnkar, Suparna V.; Deshpande, Shubha A.; Kadam, Panjabrao N. Isolated renal hydatid disease with gross hydatiduria. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 54(3):p 640-641, Jul–Sep 2011. | DOI: 10.4103/0377-4929.85129

14. Domae K, Ichikawa Y, Kubooka M, Nagata M, Ishida M, Kitagawa K, Masui S, Hattori Y, Yoshio Y, Uchida K, Ogawa T, Sakuma H. Mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney with long-term imaging follow-up. Radiol Case Rep. 2023 Jun 30;18(9):3212-3217.

doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.06.044. PMID: 37448598; PMCID: PMC10336348.

15. Mohanty SK, Parwani AV. Mixed epithelial and stromal tumors of the kidney: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(9):1483-1486. PMID: 19737388.

16. Ozturk H., “High‐Grade Primary Renal Leiomyosarcoma,” International Brazilian Journal of Urology 41, no. 2 (2015): 304–311, 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.17.

17. Dhawan S, Chopra P, Dhawan S. Primary renal leiomyosarcoma: a diagnostic challenge. Urol Ann. 2012 Jan-Apr;4(1):48-50. PMID: 22346103; PMCID: PMC3271452.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-19