Role Of Agnikarma In Management Of Cutaneous Horn W.S.R To Charmakeela Review Article

Authors

  • Dr. Sandesh Chokhar
  • Dr. Jyoti Chopade
  • Dr. Rutika Jitendra Thite

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i5.792

Keywords:

Agnikarma, Charmakila, Cutaneous Horn, Thermal Cauterization, Ayurveda, Warts, Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Kshudra Roga.

Abstract

Background: Cutaneous horn (cornu cutaneum) is a conical hyperkeratotic projection that may overlie benign, premalignant, or malignant lesions—most commonly actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Correct diagnosis requires histopathologic evaluation of the base of the horn. In Ayurveda, analogous exophytic, keratotic lesions are described as Charmakila under Kshudra Rogas, with Agnikarma (thermo-cauterization) recommended as a prime parasurgical intervention.

Objective: To synthesize classical Ayurvedic foundations of Agnikarma, its probable mechanisms, and contemporary clinical evidence relevant to cutaneous horn and Charmakila, and to identify best-practice considerations that align with modern dermatologic standards.

Methods: Narrative review of dermatology sources on cutaneous horn and Ayurveda Reviews on Agnikarma for Charmakila/warts.

Results: Dermatologic reviews report malignancy beneath cutaneous horns in ~16–30% of cases, emphasizing biopsy/excision of the base. Ayurveda reviews conceptualize Agnikarma as targeted thermal cauterization with analgesic and anti-recurrence claims; case reports document favorable outcomes for warts/Charmakila. Mechanism (Ayurveda: pacification of Vata–Kapha; biomedicine: protein denaturation, nociceptive gate control) support its role for localized keratotic lesions.

Conclusions: Agnikarma serve as a complementary modality for select benign keratotic lesions and for postoperative hemostasis; however, when managing cutaneous horns, mandatory histopathology of the base and oncologic pathways must guide care. Integrative protocols can be designed to align Agnikarma with surgical standards (proper excision, margins, sterility, informed consent), while prospective studies are needed to validate efficacy and recurrence rates against conventional methods.

Author Biographies

Dr. Sandesh Chokhar

MD (Kayachikitsa) Associate Professor, Department of Kayachikitsa, Swami Vivekanand Nursing Homes Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India

Dr. Jyoti Chopade

MD (Kayachikitsa) Associate Professor, Department of Kayachikitsa, Swami Vivekanand Nursing Homes Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India

Dr. Rutika Jitendra Thite

PG Scholar (Diploma in dermatology -Ayurveda)

References

1. DermNet NZ. Cutaneous Horn (cornu cutaneum). Accessed Dec 24, 2025. https://dermnetnz.org/topics/cutaneous-horn

2. Fernandes NF, Singh S, Lambert WC, Schwartz RA. Cutaneous horn: a potentially malignant entity. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2009;18(4):200–202.

3. Mir MA, et al. Cutaneous Horn: A devil not only in appearance. Plast Surg Case Stud. 2016;2(3):51–52.

4. WebMD. Cutaneous Horn: What You Should Know. Updated April 23, 2024.

5. Leung AKC, Barankin B. Cutaneous horn. Toronto Dermatology Centre Photoclinic. 2017. Kaur M. A Comprehensive Review of Agnikarma in Ayurveda. JEMR. 2017;4(1):69.

6. Shalu M, Benedict P, Sivakumar CS. A review on agnikarma and its probable mode of action. International Ayurvedic Medical Journal. 2023.

7. Bhingare SD, et al. Mode of Action of Agnikarma by Pain Modulation (Gate Control Theory). 2020.

8. Deshmukh VM, Thorat A. Management of Charmakila (warts) with agnikarma—single case study. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2025;14(6):94–96.

9. Sushma C, et al. A single case study of Charmakila treated with Agnikarma. JAIMS. 2020;5(4). Namburi URS, et al. Review on management of warts in Ayurveda. AYU. 2011;32(3).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29