Exploring The Psychological Challenges Faced By Young Learners In Online Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i1.822Keywords:
Psychological Challenges, Online Education, Elementary Schools, Academic Performance, Student Well-being, Educational Disruption.Abstract
The online education system propelled a sudden shift to online learning in Punjab public elementary schools, particularly in Rawalpindi, exposing significant challenges, such as inadequate access to technology, lack of teacher training, and reduced student engagement. Subjects like Science, Math, and Language Arts were especially difficult to teach online. This study addresses these ongoing issues, aiming to provide solutions for more effective online and hybrid education in the post-pandemic era.
Using a quantitative approach, the researchers conducted a descriptive study to explore these challenges and the strategies employed by teachers and students to navigate online education. The purposive sampling technique was used for sampling form the targeted schools which offered online education during the pandemic. A research questionnaire for teachers and students was developed and validated by field experts, which was designed to capture detailed insights into the participants' learning experiences and perspectives.
Data were collected from teachers and students in grades 6th, 7th, and 8th in public and semi-public schools in Rawalpindi, with a focus on subjects such as Science, Math, Arts, Social Sciences (History, Geography, Islamiyat), and Language Arts (Urdu/English). The data was analyzed using descriptive analysis, including frequency, mean differences, and standard deviation. The results indicated that teachers struggled with limited access to technology and insufficient training. The study emphasized the need to equip teachers with devices and skills for effective tech use. Additionally, student engagement in online learning was lower than in face-to-face settings, with many students finding online classes more challenging. The study found that teachers struggled with online lessons due to limited access to technology. These issues persist post-pandemic in Pakistan, where political instability, economic crises, and limited public funding make effective online education difficult.
The study recommends that the schools should have better resources and provide teachers with online teaching experience and a learning management system for unexpected closures. The government needs to invest in digital infrastructure and teacher training to improve online learning and close the digital gap. Overall, it stresses the need for professional training for teachers and students to enhance online education. As the world transitions out of the pandemic, these challenges persist, highlighting the need for improved technological infrastructure and teacher training to support blended learning models.
References
1. Ali, I. (2021). Rituals of containment: Many pandemics, body politics, and social dramas during COVID-19 in Pakistan. Frontiers in Sociology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.648149
2. Bangs, J., & Frost, D. (2012). Teacher self-efficacy, voice and leadership: Towards a policy framework for Education International. Education International Research Institute.
3. Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
4. Beth, A. (n.dyear.). COMMON CHALLENGES FOR INSTRUCTORS IN LARGE ONLINE COURSES: STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE STUDENT AND INSTRUCTOR FRUSTRATION.
5. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Correction: Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00298-3
6. Burkle, F. M. (2020). Declining public health protections within autocratic regimes: Impact on global public health security, infectious disease outbreaks, epidemics, and pandemics. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 35(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X20000424
7. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1–20.
8. Elmore, R. F. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Secondary lenses on learning participant book: Team leadership for mathematics in middle and high schools. 313–344.
9. Galagan, P., Hirt, M., & Vital, C. (2019). Capabilities for talent development: Shaping the future of the profession. American Society for Training and Development.
10. García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande, M. (2020). Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21.
11. Gilbert, B. (2015). Core.ac.uk. Retrieved March 31, 2024, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/48619313.pdf
12. Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293
13. Grant. (2007). Retrieved from high-quality attendance in the online classroom is necessary to manage this expectation in advance.
14. Guskey, T. R. (2022). Can grades be an effective form of feedback? Phi Delta Kappan, 104(3), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221136597
15. Kebritch, M. (2017). Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education.
16. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
17. Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
18. Lucas, M., & Vicente, P. N. (2023). A double-edged sword: Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of online teaching and learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5083–5103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11363-3
19. Maretha, C. (2023). Positivism in Philosophical Studies. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 3(3), 124–138.
20. Md Yunus, M., Umiera Hashim, H., & Hashim, H. (2019). Massive Open Online Courses: En route to communication skills acquisition. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 5.
21. Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, Limitations, and Recommendations for Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic era: Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Quarterly, 36(COVID19-S4), S27–S31. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785
22. Munira, S. (2022). Challenges of e-assessment in EAP classroom: a study of students and teachers' perception at tertiary level (Doctoral dissertation).
23. Nesher Shoshan, H., & Wehrt, W. (2022). Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: A mixed‐method approach. Psychologie Appliquee [Applied Psychology], 71(3), 827–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12360
24. Picciano, A. G. (2015). Paradigms, methodologies, methods, and the role of theory in online and blended learning research. In Conducting Research in Online and Blended Learning Environments (pp. 12–27). Routledge.
25. Sumalinog, G. G. (2022). Barriers of online education in the new normal: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.3
26. Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., Tusa, F., & Parola, A. (2021). Higher education response during Coronavirus: Perceptions of teachers and students, and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 7(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010043
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License permitting all use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
This work is licensed under a 
