Adapting Health Professional Education To The Needs Of An Aging Population: Challenges And Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i1.84Keywords:
Geriatric Education, Health Professional Education, Aging Population, Curriculum Integration, Faculty Development, Clinical Exposure.Abstract
Introduction: It is a major global challenge for the aging population and healthcare systems have to respond to the needs of older adults. Nevertheless, geriatric care has not been sufficiently incorporated into the curricula of health professional education (HPE). In The study, we examine the degree of geriatric education in health professional programs and the effect of such education on students’ confidence in managing chronic conditions in older adults.
Objective: The purpose of The study was to examine the integration of geriatric care into health professional curricula, identify barriers to effective integration, and assess the impact of geriatric training on student confidence in managing ageing-related health issues.
Methods: A mixed methods approach was used, including a survey of students and educators from medical, nursing, and allied health programs. The integration of geriatrics across programs was assessed using statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests and t-tests, and the confidence levels of students with versus without geriatric training were compared.
Results: The study also found that medical programs reported higher levels of integration of geriatrics into curricula than nursing and allied health programs. Students with geriatric training were significantly more confident in managing chronic conditions in older adults (p < 0.05). Chi-square analysis showed significant differences between degree programs in the level of geriatric integration (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The results of The study suggest that health professional education needs systemic change, from curriculum reform to greater faculty development and enhanced clinical exposure to geriatrics. Filling these gaps will help healthcare professionals be better prepared to deal with an ageing population.
References
1. Dorling D. World population prospects at the UN: our numbers are not our problem? In The struggle for social sustainability 2021 Apr 28 (pp. 129-154). Policy Press.
2. Liu Q, Schwartz JB, Slattum PW, Lau SJ, Guinn D, Madabushi R, Burckart G, Califf R, Cerreta F, Cho C, Cook J. Roadmap to 2030 for drug evaluation in older adults. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2022 Aug;112(2):210-23.
3. Gori C, Luppi M. Demography-once again and still challenging the welfare states. InWelfare States in a Turbulent Era 2023 Jul 14 (pp. 10-27). Edward Elgar Publishing.
4. Beard JR, Officer A, De Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, Lloyd-Sherlock P, Epping-Jordan JE, Peeters GG, Mahanani WR, Thiyagarajan JA. The World report on aging and health: a policy framework for healthy aging. The Lancet. 2016 May 21;387(10033):2145-54.
5. Scott AJ. The longevity society. The Lancet Healthy Longevity. 2021 Dec 1;2(12):e820-7.
6. Beard JR, Bloom DE. Towards a comprehensive public health response to population aging. The Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):658-61.
7. Lloyd-Sherlock P, McKee M, Ebrahim S, Gorman M, Greengross S, Prince M, Pruchno R, Gutman G, Kirkwood T, O'Neill D, Ferrucci L. Population aging and health. The Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1295-6.
8. Fu L, Sun Z, He L, Liu F, Jing X. Global long-term care research: A scientometric review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019 Jun;16(12):2077.
9. Moorman S. Dying in old age: US practice and policy. Routledge; 2020 Sep 14.
10. Lebrasseur A, Fortin-Bédard N, Lettre J, Raymond E, Bussières EL, Lapierre N, Faieta J, Vincent C, Duchesne L, Ouellet MC, Gagnon E. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults: rapid review. JMIR aging. 2021 Apr 12;4(2):e26474.
11. Idorenyin Imoh U, Charity T. Cultural and social factors in care delivery among African American caregivers of persons with dementia: A scoping review. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine. 2023 Jan;9:23337214231152002.
12. Gold DT. Late-life death and dying in 21st-century America. InHandbook of Aging and the Social Sciences 2011 Jan 1 (pp. 235-247). Academic Press.
13. Wilkinson AM, Lynn J. The end of life.
14. Goodwin M. Opportunistic Originalism: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. The Supreme Court Review. 2023 Jan 1;2022(1):111-90.
15. Habinek J, Haveman HA. Professionals and populists: the making of a free market for medicine in the United States, 1787–1860. Socio-Economic Review. 2019 Jan 1;17(1):81-108.
16. Wiggin DA, Penič B, Sulopuisto O, Setti A, Mali J, Stitzel A, Kuisma R, Baptista F, Sourtzi P, Timmons S. Postgraduate education in healthy and active aging: a systematic scoping review of learning needs, curricula and learning impact. Gerontology & geriatrics education. 2024 Jul 2;45(3):345-68.
17. Chávez EM, Kossioni A, Fukai K. Policies supporting oral health in aging populations are needed worldwide. International dental journal. 2022 Aug 1;72(4):S27-38.
18. Stoumpos AI, Kitsios F, Talias MA. Digital transformation in healthcare: technology acceptance and its applications. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2023 Feb 15;20(4):3407.
19. Akman M, Başer DA, Koban BU, Marti T, Decat P, Lefeuvre Y, Miller R. Organization of primary care. Primary health care research & development. 2022 Jan;23:e49.
20. Gregory ME, Hughes AM, Benishek LE, Sonesh SC, Lazzara EH, Woodard LD, Salas E. Toward the development of the perfect medical team: critical components for adaptation. Journal of patient safety. 2021 Mar 1;17(2):e47-70.
21. McLean SF. Case-based learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: a review of worldwide literature. Journal of medical education and curricular development. 2016 Jan;3:JMECD-S20377.
22. Goodman LA, Liang B, Helms JE, Latta RE, Sparks E, Weintraub SR. Training counseling psychologists as social justice agents: Feminist and multicultural principles in action. The counseling psychologist. 2004 Nov;32(6):793-836.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License permitting all use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
