A Comparative Analysis And Impact Of Educational Technologies On Teaching Learning Process.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v24i1-2.920Keywords:
Education, Technology, sampling, teaching, etc.Abstract
The main objective of the study was to investigate the impact of Educational Technologies on Teaching-learning Process. For achieving the objectives of research, by purposive sampling technique was used to select N=100 students comprises of 02 control groups and 02 experimental groups. Both the groups, control groups were given one treatment and experiment groups were given another treatment by the investigator. The treatment consists of special teaching sessions of 45 days in Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sunjawan Jammu and Ranbir Higher Secondary school, Jammu simultaneously. During the teaching session, the Investigator had transacted 22 topics of science(x) from NCERT syllabus. The control group were taught in traditional classroom by traditional chalk and talk lecture method whereas the experiment group were exposed to taught in smart classes where teaching was done with the help of whiteboard by using digital content which includes videos, 3D images, presentation and educational software. This paper is brief about the need for educational technologies in education and discusses major applications and challenges in education.
References
1. A. Tufan (2013). Interactive Whiteboard factor in Education: Students' points of view and their problems. Educational Research and Reviews. Vol. 8(20), pp. 1907-1915
2. Abraham Jessy (2016). E- Learning: Trends & Challenges in Educational Scenario in India, Jamia Journal of Education. Vol.3 (1), pp.92-102.
3. Agarwal, V.K. &Verma P.S, (2014), Biology, Science for Ninth Class (Part 3), New Delhi, S. Chand Publication.
4. Aduke A.F. 2008.Usage & challenges of Information Communication Technology(ICT) in Teaching and learning in Nigerian Universities. Asian Journal of Information Technology 7(7), pp.290-295.
5. Amani K. Gashan1 & Yousif A. Alshumaimeri (2015). Teachers' Attitudes toward Using Interactive Whiteboards in English Language Classrooms. International Education Studies; Vol. 8, No. 12, pp.176-184.
6. Anandan K. & Raja B.W.D., Educational Technology, New Delhi, APH Publishing Corporation.
7. Argyrous, G., Statistics for Research with the Guide to SPSS 2nd Edition, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
8. Aytekin I., Aziz A., Barakat H. & Abdelrahman M. Saudi(2012). Secondary School Teachers Attitude towards using Interactive white board in classrooms. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology.Vol.11, No. 3, pp. 286-296.
9. Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools – towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol.13 (2), 329-349.
10. Brown A.H., Benson B. &Uhde A.P. You're doing what with Technology. College Teaching .pp 100-104.
11. C. Giselia& S. Jasmin(2016).ICT Competency and Integration among Faculty Members: An Action Plan. Science Technology & Innovation Journal.pp.5-8
12. Celik.S.(2012).Competency Levels of Teachers in Using Interactive Whiteboards. Contemporary Educational Technology 3(2).pp115-129.
13. Chai. C.S. Hang H.Y &Teo T. (2004): Singaporean and Taiwanese Pre-service Teachers Belief and Their Attitude Towards the Use. A Comparative Study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 18:1, pp117-128.
14. Chand. V. S. &Shukla S. R. Teachers as transformers: Learning from outstanding primary school teachers. Gujarat Council of Primary Education, Gandhinagar Supported by UNICEF.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License permitting all use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
This work is licensed under a 
