Psychological Burden And Quality Of Life Impairment In Patients With Chronic & Recurrent Dermatophytosis.

Authors

  • Dr.Jasleen Kaur Sandhu Senior Resident; Department of Psychiatry, SGRDIMSR; Consultant psychiatrist (PART TIME); Dr Harjot Neuropsychiatry Hospital
  • Dr. Divjot Kaur Arora Senior resident; SGRDIMSR, Amritsar
  • Dr.Harjot Singh Senior Staff Specialist Psychiatrist; Rockhampton Base Hospital, Qld, Australia
  • Dr. Nitin Kumar Assistant professor; Ananta institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Rajsamand
  • Dr Sydney Moirangthem MD, FRANZCP; Senior Staff Specialist Psychiatrist; Gladston hospital, Qld, Australia ; Sydney

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v28i2%20(Part%20A).958

Keywords:

Quality of life (QoL), Chronic and recurrent dermatophytosis, DLQI, Skindex-16

Abstract

Background: Dermatophytosis, when chronic or recurrent, poses a substantial burden on patients' psychosocial quality of life.
Aim: To assess impact on quality of life in patients with chronic & recurrent dermatophytosis using DLQI & Skindex-16 scores.
Methodology: The study included 150 patients over the age of 16 who had chronic and recurrent dermatophytosis. A thorough history was obtained, and examination findings were entered into a proforma. Patients were made to fill Skindex-16 and DLQI in English and local languages. Skindex-16 scores (0–96) were converted to a linear scale from 0 to 100. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 26.
Results: Data of 150 patients was analysed. Mean DLQI score was12.18 ± 5.13 with main domain affected being  "symptoms and feelings," followed by "work and school”. 54% of the patients with CRD had a "very large effect" on their quality of life (DLQI score 11–20). Mean Skindex-16 score was 67.44 ± 21.35. According to Skindex-16, "Emotions" was the most impacted domain, followed by "Function" and then "Symptom." Higher DLQI scores were seen in patients belonging to age group 30-50. (χ2 = 33.99, p < .001). Occupation was also found to be a risk factor for higher DLQI scores with homemakers constituting the major sub-group. (χ2 = 25.183, p < .01). Higher mean percentage Skindex-16 scores were observed in younger age group (18-30 years)(p <.05). Mean percentage emotion score was significantly higher in females. (p < .05). Functional impairment was noticed in younger population. (p<0.05)
Conclusion: CRD can cause a significant reduction in quality of life. Patients should be treated by a multidisciplinary team that includes psychiatrists and psychologists.

 

 

 

References

1.Jartarkar SR, Patil A, Goldust Y, Cockerell CJ, Schwartz RA, Grabbe S, et al. Pathogenesis, immunology and management of dermatophytosis. J Fungi (Basel) [Internet]. 2021;8(1):39. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8010039

2.Dogra S, Uprety S. The menace of chronic and recurrent dermatophytosis in India: Is the problem deeper than we perceive? Indian Dermatol Online J [Internet]. 2016;7(2):73. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5178.178100

3.Mushtaq S, Faizi N, Amin SS, Adil M, Mohtashim M. Impact on quality of life in patients with dermatophytosis. Australas J Dermatol [Internet]. 2020;61(2). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajd.13191

4.Padhiyar J, Patel N, Patel A, Chhebber A, Patel B, Patel T. Psychosocial and financial impact of disease among patients of dermatophytosis, a questionnaire-based observational study. Indian Dermatol Online J [Internet]. 2020;11(3):373. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_331_19

5.Anushree LS, Anupama YG, Praveena C, Dadapeer HJ. Dermatology quality of life and psychological morbidity in patients with chronic dermatophytosis. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Feb 5];33(1):84–90. Available from: https://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/2036

6.Narang T, Bhattacharjee R, Singh S, Jha K, Kavita, Mahajan R, et al. Quality of life and psychological morbidity in patients with superficial cutaneous dermatophytosis. Mycoses [Internet]. 2019;62(8):680–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/myc.12930

7.Meneguin S, de Souza Matos TD, Pollo CF, Garuzi M, Miot HA, de Oliveira C. Psychometric characteristics of DLQI-BRA and Skindex-16 to measure the impact of dermatological diseases on quality of life in Brazilian patients. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021;16(8):e0254882. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254882

8.Baskaran N, Arunima A, Shah S, Narang T, Kumaran MS. Psychological Morbidity in Chronic Dermatological Disorders: A Review. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2025 Apr 17;16(3):381-388. doi: 10.4103/idoj.idoj_458_24. PMID: 40395584; PMCID: PMC12088501.

9.Lakum M. The Hidden Struggle: Understanding the Psychosocial Impact of Dermatological Diseases. Indian J Postgrad Dermatol. 2024;2:74-9. doi: 10.25259/IJPGD_23_2024

10.Lakshmanan A, Ganeshkumar P, Mohan SR, Hemamalini M, Madhavan R. Epidemiological and clinical pattern of dermatomycoses in rural India. Indian J Med Microbiol [Internet]. 2015;33:S134–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.150922

11.Vyas J, Johns JR, Ali FM, Ingram JR, Salek S, Finlay AY. A systematic review of 207 studies describing validation aspects of the Dermatology Life Quality Index. Acta Derm Venereol [Internet]. 2024;104:adv41120. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v104.41120

12.Abramson LY, Seligman MEP, Teasdale JD. Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1978;87(1):49-74.

13.Seligman MEP. Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco (CA): W.H. Freeman and Company; 1975

14.Verma SB, Panda S, Nenoff P, Singal A, Rudramurthy SM, Uhrlass S, et al. The unprecedented epidemic-like scenario of dermatophytosis in India: I. Epidemiology, risk factors and clinical features. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol [Internet]. 2021;87(2):154–75. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/IJDVL_301_20

15.Altabe MN, Thompson JK. Body image: a cognitive self-schema construct? Cognit Ther Res. 1996 Apr;20(2):171-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02229260.

16.Cash TF. The body image workbook: an 8-step program for learning to like your looks. Oakland (CA): New Harbinger Publications; 2008.

17.Kent G, Keohane S. Social anxiety and disfigurement: the moderating effects of fear of negative evaluation and past experience. Br J Clin Psychol. 2001;40(Pt 1):23-34. doi:10.1348/014466501163454.

18.Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Psychodermatology: an update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996 Jun;34(6):1030-1046. doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90284-4.

19.Rajagopalan M, Inamadar A, Mittal A, Miskeen AK, Srinivas CR, Sardana K, et al. Expert consensus on the management of dermatophytosis in India (ECTODERM India). BMC Dermatol [Internet]. 2018;18(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12895-018-00731

20.Steinhoff M, Dréno B, Rey AB, Morita A. The Skin−Brain Dialogue: Advancing Psychodermatology Through Integrated Approaches. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37(4):694-709. doi:10.1111/jdv.18911.

21.Szabó Á, Brodszky V, Rencz F. A comparative study on the measurement properties of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), DLQI‐Relevant and Skindex‐16. Br J Dermatol [Internet]. 2022;186(3):485–95. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.20765

22.Gergely LH, Gáspár K, Brodszky V, Kinyó Á, Szegedi A, Remenyik É, et al. Validity of EQ‐5D‐5L, Skindex‐16, DLQI and DLQI‐R in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol [Internet]. 2020;34(11):2584–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16642.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-26