The Study Of Commonalities And Differences Between Various Private And Public Companies and SHGs Concerning CSR Strategies And Initiatives Regarding Women's Empowerment

Authors

  • Akshita Rajawat
  • Dr Kedar Shukla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/ajpr.v27i1.56

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Women’s Empowerment, Financial Inclusion, STEM Education, Self-Help Groups (SHGs), Public-Private Partnerships

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) emerged as a vital force to advance women's empowerment through initiatives that focus on education access and financial inclusion for women and additional work on entrepreneurship advancement career advancement and digital education for women. The research examines CSR activities from private sector companies together with public sector enterprises and Self-Help Groups (SHGs) to measure their effects on women's social and economic advancement. A dual approach in the study combines quantitative CSR report data with qualitative content analysis of secondary studies and reports to generate findings. The research shows that Mahindra Group together with TCS and Tech Mahindra take the lead in vocational training and financial independence and STEM education programs which drives up female workforce numbers. Through SHG programs grounded at the community level people gain empowerment along with financial competence leadership training and entrepreneurial abilities in underserved rural regions. Public sector enterprises don't deliver equivalent social impact despite their large CSR funding even though they receive allocations because their implementing structures remain rigid and their organizational efficiency level remains low. The correlation study indicates that increased CSR financing does not necessarily lead to improved women's empowerment thus requiring better management programs along with better stakeholder engagement and sustained performance evaluation. The study advocates for partnerships between private and public entities together with local community involvement which should utilize improved monitoring systems to develop scalable sustainable CSR initiatives. Future scholarly investigations need to establish time-based assessments, sector-appropriate approaches, and worldwide CSR evaluations for a better understanding of how to improve gender inclusiveness strategies.

 

 

Author Biographies

Akshita Rajawat

Research Scholar, Gujarat technological university, Ahemdabad, Gujarat, India.

Email: akshitarajawat01@gmail.com

Dr Kedar Shukla

Professor and Director of college, GIDC Rajju Shroff ROFEL Institute of Management Studies, Vapi, Gujarat, India

References

1. Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2021). Women’s empowerment through financial inclusion: Evidence from microfinance programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(3), 45-68.

2. Baral, R., et al. (2023). Women entrepreneurs in India: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 94-121.

3. Dulhunty, A. (2023). Women’s Empowerment and Microcredit Programs in India: The Role of SHGs. Routledge.

4. Grosser, K., & Moon, J. (2019). CSR and gender equality: Mapping the territory. Corporate Governance, 19(4), 570-589.

5. Kabeer, N. (2020). CSR and financial inclusion for women in developing economies. Development Studies Review, 18(3), 299-315.

6. Karam, C. M., & Jamali, D. (2019). CSR and gender equality in the workplace: A critical review. Business and Society, 58(4), 775-814.

7. Narayan, D., & Pritchett, L. (2020). Women’s agency and economic development: CSR implications. World Bank Research Observer, 35(1), 23-47.

8. Patel, V. (2022). Corporate responsibility in gender mainstreaming: An empirical study. Gender and Development Review, 29(2), 112-128.

9. Ramaswamy, K., & Viswanathan, R. (2021). CSR and social enterprises: Advancing women’s entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 17(3), 210-230.

10. Saggu, D. M. S. (2024). India at G20: Governance & International Organizations. Interdisciplinary Institute of Human Security & Governance.

11. ADP India. Corporate social responsibility. ADP. Retrieved from https://www.adp.com/about-adp/corporate-social-responsibility

12. Cummins. CSR policy. Cummins. Retrieved from https://www.cummins.com/sites/default/files/india/Legal/csr-policy-updated.pdf

13. HDFC Bank. Corporate social responsibility. HDFC Bank. Retrieved from https://v.hdfcbank.com/csr/index.html

14. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. CSR policy. Hindustan Zinc. Retrieved from https://www.hzlindia.com/csr/csr-policy/

15. Mahindra Group. CSR strategy & governance. Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.mahindralifespaces.com/sustainability-impacts/csr-strategy-governance/

16. Sandvik. Annual reports. Sandvik.

17. Tata Consultancy Services (TCS). (2023). Annual report 2023-2024. Tata Consultancy Services. Retrieved from https://www.tcs.com/content/dam/tcs/investor-relations/financial-statements/2023-24/ar/annual-report-2023-2024.pdf

18. Tech Mahindra. Tech Mahindra Foundation. Tech Mahindra. Retrieved from Tech Mahindra Foundation website.

19. Unilever. (n.d.). Corporate social responsibility policy. Unilever. Retrieved from https://www.hul.co.in/investor-relations/corporate-governance/hul-policies/corporate-social-responsibility-policy/

20. Vedanta. (2023). Integrated annual report 2020-23. Vedanta. Retrieved from https://www.vedantalimited.com/uploads/investor-overview/annual-report/Vedanta-Limited-Integrated-Annual-Report-202022-23-VF.pdf

21. Arora, H. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. International Journal of Information, Business, and Management, 5(3), 15.

22. Josephine, D., Nisha, J. R., & Reena, S. A. The effect of an upcycling wood training program on creativity, skills, and psychological empowerment of rural women.

23. Dulhunty A. Women’s Empowerment and Microcredit Programs in India: The Possibilities and Limitations of Self-Help Groups. Routledge; 2023 Aug 21.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-20